Parton Distributions in PP collisions

  • Thread starter philip041
  • Start date
  • #1
107
0
I read some notes answering a question about how a Z boson is made in a proton anti-proton collision and it said that the quark antiquark collision is a very rare event because the antiquark has a small parton distribution function. Surely the up anti up(or down antidown) parton distributions are the same? The general context is the discovery of the W+ W- and Z bosons. Were these all quite difficult processes to observe?

Cheers
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
2,425
7
Surely the up anti up(or down antidown) parton distributions are the same?
I can see why their integrals should cancel, but I doubt they must be equal in all variables one can cook.

On top of that, for up or down you have contributions from the sea and the valence as well. The valence is defined as this part which does not cancel when integrated. Depending on your kinematics, the valence may contribute a lot.
 
  • #3
Meir Achuz
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
3,529
114
Neither the integrals nor the distributions of ubar and dbar are equal.
The "Gottfried sum rule" which assumes they are equal has been shown to be violated in several experiments. A good reason for their difference is that there are more pi+ mesons than there are pi- in the proton pion cloud. Use "surely" carefully.
 
  • #4
2,425
7
Neither the integrals nor the distributions of ubar and dbar are equal.
It was about the equality of u_sea with ubar_sea (on one hand, and on the other hand d_sea with dbar_sea) if I understand the question.
 
  • #5
107
0
Lol I'm out my depth already, cheers for the replies but I think I will have to hunt my elusive lecturer down...
 
  • #6
Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
26,381
9,880
It was about the equality of u_sea with ubar_sea (on one hand, and on the other hand d_sea with dbar_sea) if I understand the question.
Those aren't equal either, I'm afraid.
 
  • #7
2,425
7
Those aren't equal either, I'm afraid.
That's what I tried to convey in #2
 
  • #8
907
2
Can you give us the specific quote? I think there may be some misunderstanding here. It is an obvious consequence of CPT theorem that the spin-averaged pdf of the up-quark in proton is equal to the spin-averaged pdf of the antiup-quark in antiproton. And neither of them is small.

This quote "the quark antiquark collision is a very rare event because the antiquark has a small parton distribution function" might make sense in the context of trying to observe Z on a proton-proton collider. It is indeed rather unlikely to find an energetic antiquark inside a proton.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
907
2
grr yes that's what I meant.
 

Related Threads on Parton Distributions in PP collisions

  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
736
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
0
Views
617
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Top