Path Independence of Line Integral: del^2(f)=0

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of path independence of a line integral involving a harmonic function, specifically examining the integral of the form ∫(f_y dx - f_x dy) where del^2(f) = 0. Participants are tasked with demonstrating that this integral is independent of the path taken in a simple region D.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss rewriting the integral in terms of vector fields and question the implications of path independence. There is mention of using the Second Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and exploring the relationship between the harmonic function and the curl of the vector field.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing with participants exploring various mathematical approaches and concepts related to the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the properties of conservative vector fields and the implications of harmonic functions, but no consensus or resolution has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of the problem statement and the definitions of harmonic functions and vector fields, with an emphasis on the conditions for path independence in the context of line integrals.

fk378
Messages
366
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If f is a harmonic function, that is del^2(f)=0, show that the line integral: (integral)f_y dx - f_x dy is independent of path in any simple region D.




The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to rewrite the given integral as integral of Q dx - P dy, since path independence means vector field F=del f. But I don't know where it's supposed to take me...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that for a conservative vector field, [tex]\nabla \times \textbf{F} = 0[/tex].
 
fk378 said:

Homework Statement


If f is a harmonic function, that is del^2(f)=0, show that the line integral: (integral)f_y dx - f_x dy is independent of path in any simple region D.

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to rewrite the given integral as integral of Q dx - P dy, since path independence means vector field F=del f. But I don't know where it's supposed to take me...
Let [tex]f_{x}=M[/tex], [tex]f_{y}=N[/tex] and f is harmonic i.e. [tex]\bigtriangledown^2f(x,y)=0[/tex], then if [tex]f(x,y)= \int_{(x_{0},y_{0}}^{(x,y)}F dr[/tex] and [tex]\bigtriangledown f= Mi + Nj[/tex], then you need to prove that [tex]\int Ndx - Mdy[/tex] is path-independent.

I believe you have to use the Second Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
 
konthelion said:
Let [tex]f_{x}=M[/tex], [tex]f_{y}=N[/tex] and f is harmonic i.e. [tex]\bigtriangledown^2f(x,y)=0[/tex], then if [tex]f(x,y)= \int_{(x_{0},y_{0}}^{(x,y)}F dr[/tex] and [tex]\bigtriangledown f= Mi + Nj[/tex], then you need to prove that [tex]\int Ndx - Mdy[/tex] is path-independent.

I believe you have to use the Second Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

Or you can show that [tex]\nabla^2 f = 0 \implies \nabla \times (f_y \textbf{i} - f_x \textbf{j}) = \textbf{0}[/tex].
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K