Path integral in coherent states

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the necessity of introducing a coherent-state representation for Dirac fields in the evaluation of their path integral in quantum field theory (QFT). Unlike scalar fields, which consist of complex numbers and can be evaluated directly with scalar functions, Dirac fields are composed of spinor wavefunctions. This distinction necessitates the use of wavefunction amplitudes in the path integral for Dirac fields, highlighting the complexity of their treatment compared to scalar fields.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum Field Theory (QFT) fundamentals
  • Understanding of Dirac fields and spinor wavefunctions
  • Familiarity with path integral (functional integral) formalism
  • Knowledge of scalar fields and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the coherent-state representation in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the differences between scalar fields and Dirac fields in QFT
  • Learn about the evaluation of path integrals for different field types
  • Investigate the role of wavefunction amplitudes in quantum field theory
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum field theory, theoretical physicists focusing on particle physics, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of coherent states and path integrals.

topper
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hey,

there is something I don't really understand about the path integral (functional integral) formalism in QFT:

Why do you need to introduce a coherent-state representation of the Dirac fields in order to evaluate their path integral?
Where is the crucial point why it doesn't work like in the scalar field case, where you have the operators in the correlation function on the one side and just scalar functions under the integral on the other side?

I hope someone gets my point :)

Thanks,
topper
 
Physics news on Phys.org
_42The main difference between a scalar field and a Dirac field is that the former is composed of complex numbers, while the latter is composed of spinor wavefunctions. This means that the path integral for a Dirac field needs to be evaluated in terms of wavefunctions, rather than just scalar functions. To do this, we introduce a coherent-state representation of the Dirac fields, which allows us to express the path integral as an integration over wavefunction amplitudes. This is in contrast to the scalar field, where we can evaluate the path integral directly in terms of scalar functions without introducing a coherent-state representation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K