Hey,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

there is something I don't really understand about the path integral (functional integral) formalism in QFT:

Why do you need to introduce a coherent-state representation of the Dirac fields in order to evaluate their path integral?

Where is the crucial point why it doesn't work like in the scalar field case, where you have the operators in the correlation function on the one side and just scalar functions under the integral on the other side?

I hope someone gets my point :)

Thanks,

topper

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Path integral in coherent states

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Path integral coherent | Date |
---|---|

I Random measurements in QED? | Jan 25, 2018 |

A Path Integral of a Spontaneously Broken Theory | Jan 7, 2018 |

I Feynman path integral | Nov 14, 2017 |

I Does the path Integral contain virtual particles? | Nov 5, 2017 |

I The propagator and the Lagrangian | Aug 6, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**