PC cpu limitation ruining our movie promise

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hdace
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    cpu Movie pc
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of accurately representing time dilation in a sci-fi movie script while adhering to the principles of Einsteinian physics. Participants explore the implications of traveling at relativistic speeds and the mathematical calculations required to achieve significant time dilation over a short duration from the perspective of the characters in the film.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Hal Dace outlines the premise of their movie and the need for characters to experience significant time dilation while traveling at relativistic speeds.
  • One participant provides a formula for calculating the necessary speed to achieve the desired time dilation, suggesting that a trip of 3 days should correspond to traveling 30 million years into the future.
  • Another participant introduces the binomial approximation to simplify calculations related to the Lorentz factor, providing a specific value for speed based on the gamma factor.
  • A different participant shares results from Mathematica, comparing exact calculations and approximations for the required speed, emphasizing the precision needed for the calculations.
  • Hal Dace expresses gratitude for the assistance and confirms the narrative constraints regarding food and water for the characters, indicating a need for precise dialogue in the script.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present various methods and calculations to address the same problem, but there is no explicit consensus on a single approach or solution. Multiple competing views and calculations remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants rely on various mathematical approximations and computational tools, indicating that the calculations may depend on the precision of the tools used and the assumptions made about time and speed. There are unresolved aspects regarding the exactness of the calculations and their implications for the script.

Who May Find This Useful

Writers and creators in the sci-fi genre, particularly those interested in incorporating realistic physics into their narratives, may find the discussion valuable. Additionally, those studying relativistic physics or mathematical modeling may benefit from the shared calculations and methodologies.

hdace
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm new here.

My colleague and I are working on a sci-fi movie script. It's almost finished and it's going very well, thanks. At the beginning we made a promise. Although there inevitably has to be some small fantasy elements to any sci-fi story, we promised each other we wouldn't break Einsteinian physics, and there's no darn sound in space! Now, we know that normally these rules would lead, probably, to a kind of boring film, but we think we've got a good story, so please don't worry about that!

There is a scene where, because of a freak incident (the fantasy part), a ship is unexpectedly accelerated to a speed that is over 99% of SOL. More fantasy parts are that the passengers are not pasted like jelly on the aft wall of the ship's bridge, and space dust doesn't puncture holes in the hull. What was that promise again?

Because of an important subplot, it's important that they travel at least 30 million years into the future 'cause of time dilation. Now, I THINK I understand the Lorentz factor. I worked out that if c = 1 ly, and v = 0.9 (etc) with 15 9's after the decimal, that in one year the ship would travel 15.8 million years into the future. Not only is that not enough years, but we want the trip to only be a few days at most inside the ship.

Now, as I understand it, in theory, if the freak incident made them go so fast that there were more than just 15 9's after the decimal point, then we could achieve what we're looking for. Trouble is, it would appear that a PC isn't capable of doing that! At least that's what we think is going on. So, could anyone kindly confirm this, and also let me know if there's any kind of workaround that would allow us to determine the speed it would take to do the 30 million in just a few days? Would it be something like 0.9 (etc) with more like 25 or 30 9's after the decimal?

I know, kinda bizarre, but hey, I think it's fun!

Thanks, Hal Dace
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The formula for figuring out what percent of the speed of light you would have to go is:

[tex]Sqrt(1-v^2)[/tex]
v = (number of days the trip takes)/(Number of days in 30 million years)
So a 3 day trip makes: v=0.000000000456621004566210045662100456621 (not counting leap year)

The calculator needs more than 15 significant digits to calculate it. What you can do for a scene is have a character try to calculate it and not have a calculator that can do it. So maybe they are not sure how close to light speed they are. They just know it cannot be very many days at that speed, which they very roughly know by how fast they get by known star systems.

Of course you can also download a calculator from the internet with enough digits to pull it off.
 
Using the binomial approximation (which is an excellent approximation in this case):

[tex]\sqrt{1-v^2} = (1-v^2)^{1/2} \approx 1-\frac{1}{2}v^2[/tex]

Using your value of v, I get 1 - 0.000000000000000000104 = 0.999999999999999999896. The last step is easy enough to do without a calculator. For me it is, at least.
 
Assuming a few is 3, the gamma factor to time dilate 30 million years into 3 days is 3.65 * 10^9, ignoring leap years, etc. For large gamma, it is straightforward to compute that the following is a very good approximation (in units of c):

v = 1 - 1/(2*gamma^2)

Thus v (appx) = 1 - 3.75*10^-20 =
.9999999999999999999625 (19 nines)
 
To 40 decimal places, taking 3 days as 0.008214 years, Mathematica gives, for the exact formula,

N[Sqrt[1 - ((365230*10^(-5))*(10^9))^(-2)], 40]
= 0.9999999999999999999625167605087179983996,

and for the suggested approximation (2nd order Taylor series expansion about 0),

N[1 - (1/2)*((365230*10^(-5))*(10^9))^(-2), 40]
= 0.9999999999999999999625167605087179984003.

You can also compare these methods online, using Wolfram Alpha:

http://www.wolframalpha.com/

Exact formula: Sqrt[1-(3.65230*10^9)^(-2)]
Approximation: 1-(1/2)*(3.65230*10^9)^(-2)
 
So three days equals 30 million years if you're traveling at 0.9 (etc) of c with 19 nines after the decimal (etc). Thank you so much for your help guys! We really appreciate it.

Yes, the characters in the story have almost no food and little water, so 3 days are about right. Now we can get the dialog right. Thanks again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
15K