PDE Separation of Variables with Nonzero Boundary Conditions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the diffusion equation given by u_{xx}-\alpha^2 u_{t}=0, with specified nonzero boundary conditions u(0,t)=u_{0} and u(L,t)=u_{L}, as well as an initial condition u(x,0)=\phi(x). Participants are exploring the separation of variables method and the implications of the nonhomogeneous boundary conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • One participant attempts to solve the equation using separation of variables, expressing the solution in terms of products of functions of x and t. They express confusion regarding how to handle the nonzero boundary conditions. Another participant suggests a substitution to separate the problem into homogeneous and nonhomogeneous parts, raising questions about the method's validity and its application to the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different methods to address the nonhomogeneous boundary conditions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the substitution method, and one participant has indicated success after applying the suggested approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the challenges posed by nonzero boundary conditions, which differ from typical problems with zero-valued boundaries. There is an emphasis on understanding the implications of these conditions on the solution process.

jtleafs33
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Solve the diffusion equation:

u_{xx}-\alpha^2 u_{t}=0

With the boundary and initial conditions:

u(0,t)=u_{0}
u(L,t)=u_{L}
u(x,0=\phi(x)

The Attempt at a Solution



I want to solve using separation of variables...
I start by assuming a solution of the form:

u(x,t)=X(x)T(t)

Differentiating and dropping the notation so f(F) = F :

u_{x}=X'T
u_{xx}=X''T
u_{t}=XT'

Substituting back into the PDE,

X''T-\alpha^2 XT'=0
X''T=\alpha^2 XT

\frac{X''}{X}=\alpha^2 \frac{T'}{T}

Let each side be equal to a constant, -\lambda^2
So now we have two ODE's:

X''+\lambda^2 X=0
T'+(\frac{\lambda}{\alpha})^2 T=0

These ODE's are easy to solve:

T(t)=Ae^{-(\frac{\lambda}{\alpha})^2 t}
X(x)=Bsin(\lambda x)+Ccos(\lambda x)

So now, let AB=A and AC=B so the PDE has the general solution:

u_{\lambda}(x,t)=e^{-(\frac{\lambda}{\alpha})^2 t}[Asin(\lambda x)+Bcos(\lambda x)]

So now, I want to match my boundary conditions. All the other PDE's I've solved have zero-valued boundary conditions, so I'm not exactly sure what to do here.

u(0,t)=u_{0}=e^{-(\frac{\lambda}{\alpha})^2 t}[Asin(0)+Bcos(0)]
u(0,t)=u_{0}=Be^{-(\frac{\lambda}{\alpha})^2 t}

This is where I'm confused.
To satisfy the B.C., my intuition says B=u_{0} and e^{-(\frac{\lambda}{\alpha})^2 t} must be a multiple of \pi.
Even if this is correct, I'm not sure how to express it as a constraint on \lambda.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jtleafs33 said:

Homework Statement


Solve the diffusion equation:

u_{xx}-\alpha^2 u_{t}=0

With the boundary and initial conditions:

u(0,t)=u_{0}
u(L,t)=u_{L}
u(x,0=\phi(x)

The Attempt at a Solution



I want to solve using separation of variables...

Before you separate variables, make the substitution ##u(x,t) = v(x,t) +\psi(x)##. Substitute that into your problem:$$
v_{xx} + \psi''(x) + v_t = 0$$ $$
v(0,t) + \psi(0) = u_0$$ $$
v(L,t) + \psi(L) = u_L$$ $$
v(x,0) + \psi(x) = \phi(x)$$
Now if you let ##\psi''(x)=0,\ \psi(0)=u_0,\ \psi(L)=u_L##, you can solve for ##\psi(x)## and what is left is a system in ##v(x)## you can separate variables on. Your boundary conditions will be homogeneous and the last equation will be ##v(x,0)=\phi(x) - \psi(x)##. Your final answer will be ##u(x,t) = v(x,t)+\psi(x)##.
 
LCKurtz,

I can't find anything like that in my textbook. Did you do that so the solution would satisfy both the nonhomogenous and homogenous parts? I suppose you added the extra function of x because the nonhomogenous boundary conditions only depend on x?
 
jtleafs33 said:
LCKurtz,

I can't find anything like that in my textbook. Did you do that so the solution would satisfy both the nonhomogenous and homogenous parts? I suppose you added the extra function of x because the nonhomogenous boundary conditions only depend on x?

I don't know about your text, but it is a standard method. You let the ##\psi(x)## take care of the nonhomogeneous part. So did you try it on your problem?
 
I will be trying it soon.
 
Got it! It was trivial after I did the substitution you mentioned. Thanks again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K