Pendulum and cart harmonic motion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the dynamics of a simple pendulum attached to a cart, specifically analyzing the amplitude of the cart's motion when the pendulum is released from a 10-degree angle. The pendulum has a mass of 0.28 kg and a length of 0.65 m, while the cart has a mass of 1.0 kg. The initial attempt at solving the problem involved an incorrect application of energy conservation principles and failed to account for gravitational potential energy. A more effective approach suggested is the conservation of momentum, which could yield a more accurate understanding of the system's motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simple harmonic motion
  • Knowledge of gravitational potential energy
  • Familiarity with conservation of momentum
  • Basic principles of kinetic energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of simple harmonic motion in pendulums
  • Learn about gravitational potential energy calculations
  • Explore conservation of momentum in dynamic systems
  • Investigate kinetic energy transformations in oscillating systems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of pendulum systems and their interactions with other bodies.

Frillth
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A simple pendulum of mass m = .28 kg and length L = .65 m is attached to a cart of mass M = 1.0 kg. The mass of the pendulum support is negligible. The cart can roll rreely on a horizontal surface. At t = 0, the pendulum bob is released from rest when the string makes an angle of 10 degrees with the vertical. assume that the resulting motion of the cart relative to the ground is simple harmonic motion. Determine the amplitude of the motion of the cart.

Homework Equations



Not sure.

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure how to solve this, but I had a completely unscientific intuitive guess that the distance pendulum travels * pendulum's mass = distance cart travels * cart's mass:

Horizontal distance between bob at 10 degrees and vertical = .65*sin10

.65*sin10 * .28 = 1*x
x = .032 m

Is this at all close to correct? If not, could somebody please point me in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You seem to be attempting a conservation of energy approach, which might work, but I'm disturbed about a number of things:

Note: for both energy-like terms... you're using distance times mass. Is that right?

First: For the potential energy of the pendulum you are missing a factor that's pretty important. You have height of the pendulum times that pendulum's mass -- but there's something missing to make it ENERGY. In this case the factor you're missing is known... what is it? hint: It' energy related to height it's gravitational potential energy!) I also suggest you ALWAYS carry the units with your math to be sure your result has units that you want.

Second: Your equation for work done on the cart would also be wrong. Again, your units are off and you're missing a factor... but in this case... do you know that factor? Even more important... is that factor constant over time? Note: Based on the motion of the cart, I don't think it can be! Note: this unknown might make it possibly very difficult to find the distance based on your approach.

Also note: You haven't considered all ways the energy is transferred... you might want to think about kinetic energy of the pendulum and cart.
The big questions about this are:
What is the pendulum doing when the cart is at maximum displacement?
What are the pendulum and cart doing when the pendulum is at it's lowest point?
etc.

I was thinking about the possibility of a conservation of momentum approach. Have you thought of that? I think it's much more promising. You could probably do something cool with the resulting velocity equation of motion...
 
If the cart can move freely along the horizontal direction then the center of mass of the system is at rest along this direction.
I think that this is what you were trying to do, right?. (distance*mass...)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
20K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K