Pendulum - How it affects gear train torque?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the length of a pendulum and the torque experienced by a gear train in a weight-driven clock. Participants explore both the physics and design implications of changing the pendulum length, considering how it affects torque delivery and requirements within the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the inquiry is framed as a physics or design question, suggesting that the physics aspect concerns how pendulum length affects torque delivered by the escapement.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the pendulum acts as a driven oscillator, asserting that it does not apply torque to the gear train, but rather the gear train applies torque to the pendulum.
  • This participant also notes that the gear train must provide sufficient torque to counteract air resistance without excessively increasing the pendulum's arc.
  • There is a suggestion that the torque applied by the gear train to the pendulum remains unchanged regardless of pendulum length, based on Newton's third law.
  • A later post introduces a hypothetical scenario regarding the placement of the escapement/pendulum assembly between gears, questioning whether this configuration would alter the torque on downstream gears if the pendulum length is increased.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between pendulum length and torque. While some assert that the torque applied by the gear train remains unchanged with pendulum length, others raise questions about the implications of different configurations and the nature of torque transfer within the system. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not reached consensus on how pendulum length affects torque in the gear train, and assumptions about the nature of torque transfer and the role of the escapement are not fully clarified.

jryer
Messages
20
Reaction score
1
Does the gear train in a classic weight driven clock see a torque decrease when we lengthen the pendulum?

thanks guys for your help - (inventor question)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you asking this as a physics question or as a design question?

The physics version would be: "How would lengthening the part of the pendulum below the pivot point change the torque delivered by the escapement"

The design question would be: "How would lengthening the part of the pendulum below the pivot point change the torque required from the escapement".
 
jbriggs444 said:
Are you asking this as a physics question or as a design question?

The physics version would be: "How would lengthening the part of the pendulum below the pivot point change the torque delivered by the escapement"

The design question would be: "How would lengthening the part of the pendulum below the pivot point change the torque required from the escapement".

The first one - "How would lengthening the part of the pendulum below the pivot point change the torque delivered by the escapement; would it increase or decrease?"

Also, I'm assuming the change in the torque delivered is transferred (seen/realized) to the gear train, is this a correct assumption?
 
Possibly we are still speaking at cross-purposes.

To my way of thinking, the pendulum is a driven oscillator. It does not apply torque to the gear train. The gear train applies torque to it. In the absence of any applied torque, it would continue move back and forth in an arc that slowly decreases over time due primarily to air resistance.

The gear train has to provide enough torque to overcome the losses due to air resistance. But it must not provide so much so that the pendulum's arc increases too greatly. [The escapement assures that this torque is applied in proper synchronization with the pendulum's motion].

So my answer is that the torque applied by the gear train/escapement on the pendulum is unchanged by the length of the pendulum. From Newton's third law, the torque applied by the pendulum to the escapement/gear train is also unchanged.
 
jbriggs444 said:
Possibly we are still speaking at cross-purposes.

To my way of thinking, the pendulum is a driven oscillator. It does not apply torque to the gear train. The gear train applies torque to it. In the absence of any applied torque, it would continue move back and forth in an arc that slowly decreases over time due primarily to air resistance.

The gear train has to provide enough torque to overcome the losses due to air resistance. But it must not provide so much so that the pendulum's arc increases too greatly. [The escapement assures that this torque is applied in proper synchronization with the pendulum's motion].

So my answer is that the torque applied by the gear train/escapement on the pendulum is unchanged by the length of the pendulum. From Newton's third law, the torque applied by the pendulum to the escapement/gear train is also unchanged.

JBriggs, take a look at this link

http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/gadgets/clocks-watches/clock4.htm

What happens if we put the escapement/pendulum assembly between the blue (1st) and purple (2nd) gears? Now does lengthening the pendulum affect the torque on the downstream gears (purple, green, and plum gears)?

thanks again
 
Bump. Anyone care to contribute on the 7:50pm post? thanks again
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K