Pentaquark Particles: New Doubts Cast on Their Existence in Recent Experiment

  • Thread starter Thread starter humanino
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Recent discussions have raised doubts about the existence of pentaquarks, particularly following a new experiment whose data is still being analyzed. Some participants express skepticism about the pentaquark concept, feeling it does not fit well within current particle physics frameworks. The conversation also touches on the nature of quark configurations, clarifying that a pentaquark consists of three quarks and a quark-antiquark pair, resembling a combination of baryons and mesons. Additionally, the existence of four-quark states, previously known as baryonium, is acknowledged, with strong evidence for them remaining unrefuted despite their decline in popularity. Overall, the topic remains contentious, with ongoing research needed to reach a consensus on these exotic particles.
humanino
Messages
2,523
Reaction score
8
You said "pentaquark" !?

All right, it is now officially released :
Doubt is cast on pentaquarks
Another dedicated experiment in the same lab is still under the process of data analysis. Let us hope they will agree with each other !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is good. I always really felt that the pentaquark didn't fit in. I never really liked the idea, it felt quite odd to me to have a pentaquark particle. But I suppose the jury is still out, so I will have to wait and see.
 
Is there any particle made up of more than 3 quarks? I read the Pentaquark link, but didn't I hear news of a suspected 4 quark particle some time back?

Thanks
 
I doubt it. Unless it were two quark-antiquark pairs, which annihilate straight away, color would not be confined.
 
El Hombre Invisible said:
I doubt it. Unless it were two quark-antiquark pairs, which annihilate straight away, color would not be confined.

4-quark and 5-quark systems can be colorless because 2 and 3 quark system are colorless and sums of colorless systems are also colorless.

And quark-antiquark pairs do not necessarily annihilate "straight away". See charmonium.
 
Tell me about charmonium.
 
I think there might be a confusion about language.
"Pentaquark" does not mean 5 quarks.
The PQ is composed of 3 quarks and an additional quark-antiquark pair.
This makes it a bit like a molecule of a baryon and a meson, and not all that exotic.
Its narrow width, if obvserved, is what makes it unusual.
"Four quark" states really mean two quarks and two antiquarks.
They were hot about 20 years ago, and were called "baryonium".
They fell into disrepute, but strong evidence for them was never overturned.
The quarks would not immediately annihilate if they formed two diquarks some distance apart.
 
Well, that's like calling a helium nucleus a dodecaquark!
 

Similar threads

High School What's Delaying Fermilab's Muon g-2 Results Release?
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
14K
Undergrad Does the New Muon g-2 Measurement Indicate Physics Beyond the Standard Model?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Undergrad New muon g-2 calculation consistent with experiment
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
Undergrad "Wave-particle duality" and double-slit experiment
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
Undergrad ATLAS and CMS see signs of Higgs->muons decay
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
Undergrad Glueballs Observed For The First Time
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Undergrad Why Monte Carlo Simulations? What do they tell us?
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
High School Proving the Existence of Particles: An Exploration
  • · Replies 94 ·
4
Replies
94
Views
6K
Graduate Extended Wigner’s Friend Scenario and the existence of the reality
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Undergrad How do the collider experiments measure the mass of the W boson?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K