People not interested in science?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AdrianHudson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Science
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the declining interest in science and mathematics among the general population, particularly in high school settings. Participants highlight that many individuals prefer easier pursuits, such as entertainment, over the challenges posed by scientific study. The conversation also touches on societal shifts that have led to a perception of science as a professional domain, limiting hands-on experimentation and curiosity among youth. Factors such as increased distractions from technology and a lack of engaging educational experiences contribute to this trend.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic scientific principles and mathematics.
  • Familiarity with educational trends in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics).
  • Awareness of societal attitudes towards science and education.
  • Knowledge of historical context regarding science education and public perception.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of technology on youth engagement in science education.
  • Explore methods to enhance STEM curriculum in high schools.
  • Investigate the historical evolution of science education policies post-Manhattan Project.
  • Examine case studies of successful science outreach programs for young students.
USEFUL FOR

Educators, policymakers, parents, and anyone interested in improving science literacy and engagement among youth.

AdrianHudson
Messages
48
Reaction score
2
Ok question, it seems to me that now a days people are not interested in science. In my high school just hate science and math and I don't understand why, so my question is why are people hating on math and science :(?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm surrounded by people that are interested in science. Many of them have made careers out of it. So it's probably just a matter of where you are and who you know.

Also, in high school, not many people are interested in normal things; it's a bit of a metamorphic stage for humans.
 
In the USA, depending on what study you read, somewhere between 40% and 60% of the population believes in ghosts, aliens, and angels. The vast majority of people will never use anything but the most rudimentary science and math and have no interest in them. My question back to you would be, why SHOULD they be interested in them? Pseudo-science and conspiracy theories are so much easier.

I find this really disgusting and, like Pythagorean, I personally spend most of my time with people who DO like math and science but when I go to Walmart I'm pretty sure the folks there couldn't make correct change without their automatic registers.
 
Studying math and science is hard; playing with your phone and hanging out with your friends are soooo much easier.
 
TFNdashTDrY‎[/youtube] Edit: the vi...nk- [url]www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3pYRn5j7oI‎
(Don't know about you...)
Edit2: the transcript with relevant lines:
Feynman said:
It's Interesting that some people find science so easy and others find it kind of dull and difficult
especially kids; you know, some of them are just heated up, and I don't know why it is. It's the same for all... (**)
For instance some people love music and I could never carry a tune. I lose a great deal a pleasure out of that
and I think that people lose a lot of pleasure who find the science dull.
In the case of science, I think that one of the things that make it difficult is that it takes a lot of imagination.
It's very hard to imagine all the crazy things that things really are like.
...
...whether the steam evaporates until you cover the cover, and all these things you can understand from this simple picture.
And that's a kind of lot of fun to think. I don't want to take this stuff seriously;I think we should just have fun imagining it, not worry about. There is no teaching when you are asking a question at the end, otherwise it's a horrible subject.
 
Last edited:
Same here in Germany.
In former times there were much more people doing experiments at home, were programming or doing electronic circuitery.
Today if you buy some ml of hydrogen peroxide, you already risk an anti terrorism squad taking your house.
I see a general tendency in western societies to narrow science as science done by professional research organizations like universities. This goes in hand with restricting the freedom of science and education.
Even teachers at high schools can't do any more many of the experiments I was shown or doing in class as a pupil.
I think this ultimately started with the Manhattan project when science was beginning to be seen both as a potential threat and as only achievable in large projects.
Subsequently, department structures were implemented also at most universities in Europe and organizations like CERN or the NASA were created.
 
It makes me so mad. PEOPLE DON'T WANT TO PUT EFFORT INTO THEIR EDUCATION, honestly I can't say I'm perfect heck I slack off and sometimes get lazy but in the end I'm willing to put in the work and I get good marks. I'm trying to learn calculus way before my peers not because I want to try to act smart but because it genuinely interests me. I know a lot more then all my peers (not trying to come off with a superiority complex or anything like that) but that's because I get curious I could spend hours and hours looking at engineering textbooks, studying physics looking at how particle accelerators works, learning about what the universe is made of ,the world is a beautiful place and it gets a heck of a lot more beautiful when you look at it through the eyes of a physicist or biologist or chemist and people don't want to they are fine with doing the bare minimum.

Sorry for the long winded paragraph but sheesh its so enraging.

P.S sorry for any grammar errors typed that fast.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SaifTaher
People have different interests and they can choose to have a lack of interest in whatever they want. Do you have a precocious interest in literature, art, music, and/or journalism? Don't judge other people for their lack of interest in something you deem important.
 
WannabeNewton said:
People have different interests and they can choose to have a lack of interest in whatever they want. Do you have a precocious interest in literature, art, music, and/or journalism? Don't judge other people for their lack of interest in something you deem important.

Yeah I guess that's true, I mean what i find cool other people might find lame but I understand that different strokes for different folks but I think it should make people kind of curious to find out why they're here no?
 
  • #10
A lot of people have more important problems in their lives than worrying about why they're here; if you're interested in physics and math then good for you but don't berate people who aren't. The same exact people can berate you for a lack of interest in something else. How would you feel then?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #11
WannabeNewton said:
A lot of people have more important problems in their lives than worrying about why they're here.

Yeah I guess you are right, I probably sound like a nut now haha... What I am saying isn't applying to everyone though what I'm trying to apply this to is people who only concern themselves with garbage. This current generation which I'm apart of there is people caring more about celebrity gossip and who's dating who then things that actually better society I tried to talk to a group of people about the recent launch to the moon and how China is working on its space program but they didn't even know it happened.

To add to this. I understand being on a physics forum my view on the world is obviously biased towards an opinion or a general idea, but this generation is lazy, people end up not trying and after they graduate they end up in jobs they hate where they work a crappy job just because they didn't apply themselves. I couldn't care less about what people do and what interests them. I mean I probably realize that it came off as people who don't do science or math as their career is not applying themselves yada yada yada, but as the conversation evolves I want you to know my opinion might not have came off a right way haha.

P.S take none of this to heart I'm just expressing my views. :)
 
Last edited:
  • #12
AdrianHudson said:
To add to this. I understand being on a physics forum my view on the world is obviously biased towards an opinion or a general idea, but this generation is lazy, people end up not trying and after they graduate they end up in jobs they hate where they work a crappy job just because they didn't apply themselves. I couldn't care less about what people do and what interests them. I mean I probably realize that it came off as people who don't do science or math as their career is not applying themselves yada yada yada, but as the conversation evolves I want you to know my opinion might not have came off a right way haha.

Calling Generation Y lazy is easy but there's very little evidence that it's true as far as I can tell. All the media likes to complain about how people in their teens and 20s waste all their time on facebook, but

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/29/weekinreview/29graduates.html?_r=0

is a good counterpoint to the prevailing view.

There is ample evidence that young people today are hard-working and productive. The share of college students working full time generally grew from 1985 onward — until the Great Recession knocked many millennials out of the labor force, according to the Labor Department.

Between 1989 and 2006, the share of teenagers who were volunteering doubled, to 26.4 percent from 13.4 percent, according to a report by the Corporation for National and Community Service. And the share of incoming college freshmen who say they plan to volunteer is at a record high of 32.1 percent, too, U.C.L.A.’s annual incoming freshman survey found.

So my opinion now is studies or it didn't happen.
 
  • #13
"Takes all kinds of people to make up a world"
- Kurt Vonnegut
 
  • #14
DrDu said:
Same here in Germany.
In former times there were much more people doing experiments at home, were programming or doing electronic circuitery.
Today if you buy some ml of hydrogen peroxide, you already risk an anti terrorism squad taking your house.
I see a general tendency in western societies to narrow science as science done by professional research organizations like universities. This goes in hand with restricting the freedom of science and education.
Even teachers at high schools can't do any more many of the experiments I was shown or doing in class as a pupil.
I think this ultimately started with the Manhattan project when science was beginning to be seen both as a potential threat and as only achievable in large projects.
Subsequently, department structures were implemented also at most universities in Europe and organizations like CERN or the NASA were created.

DrDu makes an important point. The exposure to science for kids now is much different than it was for kids who grew up thirty or forty years ago. For one thing, there are more distractions with electronics besides television: there are computer games, phones, social media, all sorts of stuff which was science fiction back then or not even heard of. Nowadays, kids take all this stuff for granted and don't realize that most of it did not exist as few as twenty years ago. When was the last time you stumbled across a chemistry set which you could take home and do experiments without getting a permit from the EPA? When was the last time you saw an erector set which had steel parts with all kinds of sharp edges and enough teeny-tiny screws and nuts to choke an entire pre-school? A lot of kids today follow time schedules as rigid as those for any adult who is working and there is not a lot of spare time in the schedule for goofing around with stuff.
 
  • #15
SteamKing said:
DrDu makes an important point. The exposure to science for kids now is much different than it was for kids who grew up thirty or forty years ago. For one thing, there are more distractions with electronics besides television: there are computer games, phones, social media, all sorts of stuff which was science fiction back then or not even heard of. Nowadays, kids take all this stuff for granted and don't realize that most of it did not exist as few as twenty years ago. When was the last time you stumbled across a chemistry set which you could take home and do experiments without getting a permit from the EPA? When was the last time you saw an erector set which had steel parts with all kinds of sharp edges and enough teeny-tiny screws and nuts to choke an entire pre-school? A lot of kids today follow time schedules as rigid as those for any adult who is working and there is not a lot of spare time in the schedule for goofing around with stuff.

Do you think that the limiting of this home science makes it not worth it and thus makes people not follow their curious side of science ?
 
  • #16
Enigman said:
TFNdashTDrY‎[/youtube] Edit: the vi...nk- [url]www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3pYRn5j7oI‎
(Don't know about you...)
Edit2: the transcript with relevant lines:

Thats why I don't like the openended courses in high school.. I ask a question as to why something is the way it is and the teacher will say "dont worry about about it" or the famous line "you will learn that in grade 12"

This was addressed to the "if you are asking question at the end of a lesson or course"
 
Last edited:
  • #17
AdrianHudson said:
Do you think that the limiting of this home science makes it not worth it and thus makes people not follow their curious side of science ?

I think that those kids who have an insatiable curiosity about things will do just fine. The kids who are just plugging along, following their kid careers, may not find or get the chance to do something out of the ordinary, which might set them onto a different path in life.
 
  • #18
SteamKing said:
I think that those kids who have an insatiable curiosity about things will do just fine. The kids who are just plugging along, following their kid careers, may not find or get the chance to do something out of the ordinary, which might set them onto a different path in life.

This is kinda unrelated but what home project do you find the most fun? For me it was an electrolysis machine :)
 
  • #19
To keep it back on topic, I hear a lot from my friends on how they think science and math is all memorization, while that is true IN certain circumstances most of math and science is understanding WHY things are the way they are or WHY we use that equation to find out this "thing".

Do you think that science and math get a bad rep for being subjects where you have to memorize ?
 
  • #20
AdrianHudson said:
Do you think that science and math get a bad rep for being subjects where you have to memorize ?

Not that I know of. If anything, subjects like biology have the bad rep with regards to memorization.
 
  • #21
WannabeNewton said:
Not that I know of. If anything, subjects like biology have the bad rep with regards to memorization.

Amen, I'm experiencing that one right now. Biology is a load of memorization.

"Name this valve of the heart"
"What does the liver do"
 
  • #22
Imagine living in a world where everyone loved science, where everyone was an atheist - where culture, religion and social constructs died at the shores of the incoming technological tsunami, where we placed efficiency ontop of a pedestal as our god and disposed of those silly, useless, time-wasting arts that deal with fantasy (Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter etc) and nonsense

In an efficient and perfect world, people die of boredom
 
  • #23
Caveat said:
Imagine living in a world where everyone loved science, where everyone was an atheist - where culture, religion and social constructs died at the shores of the incoming technological tsunami, where we placed efficiency ontop of a pedestal as our god and disposed of those silly, useless, time-wasting arts that deal with fantasy (Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter etc) and nonsense

In an efficient and perfect world, people die of boredom

I understand the point you are making, but I don't see how more knowledge equals the extinction of the arts/culture. I'm sure some things would change, of course, but I think there are way too many unknowns.
 
  • #24
phinds said:
In the USA, depending on what study you read, somewhere between 40% and 60% of the population believes in ghosts, aliens, and angels. The vast majority of people will never use anything but the most rudimentary science and math and have no interest in them. My question back to you would be, why SHOULD they be interested in them? Pseudo-science and conspiracy theories are so much easier.

I find this really disgusting and, like Pythagorean, I personally spend most of my time with people who DO like math and science but when I go to Walmart I'm pretty sure the folks there couldn't make correct change without their automatic registers.

I remember a group of students becoming distraught when the evolution unit was taught in HS biology. Even in a fairly educated northern state, we have our fair share of loons. I confronted them on why they thought it was BS, after telling me about "the Bible", they couldn't come up with anything to refute the evidence. As revenge he unfriended me on FB. :approve:


WannabeNewton said:
A lot of people have more important problems in their lives than worrying about why they're here; if you're interested in physics and math then good for you but don't berate people who aren't. The same exact people can berate you for a lack of interest in something else. How would you feel then?

I don't completely agree with you here. A lot of people have an open dislike for science and math. In talking with a lot of family or friends, I see plenty of hate towards science and mathematics. I'm perfectly OK with somebody not being into as much as we at PF are, but when you have an open dislike towards a subject that's so fundamental to all of our lives, I see that as an ignorant view. Hating a subject that you've never taken the time to explore is really a sad way to live.

It is really a good thing that there are people who have different interests. Let's be honest, if everyone was a scientist or mathematician, we'd probably collapse as a society pretty soon.

Maybe your experience was different in HS, but where I went, kids used to avoid chemistry/bio/physics,math like it was the plague.
 
  • #25
AdrianHudson said:
Amen, I'm experiencing that one right now. Biology is a load of memorization.

"Name this valve of the heart"
"What does the liver do"
I still remember biology tests, name all of the bones in the human body and name all of the muscles. Talk about short term memory dump. Memorized it all the night before, aced the test, forgot it the next day.
 
  • #26
Evo said:
I still remember biology tests, name all of the bones in the human body .

Bones...I know bones!
tumblr_lg7x0pDOeT1qa8jb7o1_500.gif

Bones
 
Last edited:
  • #27
Well, kids in middle school have raging hormones - which can be very distracting. Who cares about science or math when you have an overwhelming need to breed? That is why scientists seem so socially inept. It's the only way they survived youthful enthusiasm - they were social outcasts.
 
  • #28
Chronos said:
Well, kids in middle school have raging hormones - which can be very distracting. Who cares about science or math when you have an overwhelming need to breed? That is why scientists seem so socially inept. It's the only way they survived youthful enthusiasm - they were social outcasts.

You should write for Big Bang Theory.
 
  • #29
Chronos said:
Well, kids in middle school have raging hormones - which can be very distracting. Who cares about science or math when you have an overwhelming need to breed? That is why scientists seem so socially inept. It's the only way they survived youthful enthusiasm - they were social outcasts.

I don't totally agree with this, I excel at the math and sciences portion of school. While I do not have enough time to constantly hang out with friends I have a good social circle and I have a girlfriend.
 
  • #30
Enigman said:
Bones...I know bones!
tumblr_lg7x0pDOeT1qa8jb7o1_500.gif

Bones

Oh god hahaha 10/10 seriously though I much prefer microbiology and genetics way more than the stuff we do, the idea of being able to choose genomes that a species has is way cool. :cool::beer:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
6K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
277
  • · Replies 470 ·
16
Replies
470
Views
36K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K