Perfect Symmetry: The Perfect Universe

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Antonio Lao
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Symmetry
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of perfect symmetry in the universe, exploring theoretical implications, complementary logic, and its potential applications in various fields, including artificial intelligence and genetics. Participants share their interpretations and thoughts on these topics, leading to a multifaceted conversation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Heinz R. Pagels' ideas on perfect symmetry suggest a universe where energy and mass are interchangeable, and fundamental forces like gravity do not exist.
  • Some participants express interest in the implications of complementary logic (CL) and its relationship to artificial intelligence and the structure of DNA.
  • Antonio Lao discusses the principles of mathematical logic and its relevance to the discussion, particularly in relation to the concept of complementarity in physics.
  • There are references to the limitations of digital computers compared to human cognitive abilities, particularly in pattern recognition and information processing.
  • Participants explore the idea that CL could provide insights into the dual nature of reality and the interplay of opposites in various systems.
  • Questions arise regarding the application of CL in decoding DNA and whether it was utilized in the Human Genome Project.
  • Concerns are raised about the ethical implications of advanced technology and the need for effective communication methods to ensure safety and understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the implications of perfect symmetry and complementary logic, with no clear consensus reached. Some agree on the potential of CL, while others question its application in specific contexts like DNA decoding.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of the topics discussed, including the limitations of their understanding of complementary logic and its mathematical foundations. There are also references to the evolving nature of technology and its ethical considerations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring theoretical physics, logic, artificial intelligence, and the intersection of technology and ethics.

  • #31
By Complementary Logic the whole numbers are only private case of some information structure with 0 redundancy and 0 uncertainty.

All standard today's fructions are based on this information structure of 0 redundancy and 0 uncertainty.

So by CL we can define infinitely many information structure models that where out of the scope of any scientific research until now.

We don't know yet what changes can take place in today's standard space/time model from CL point of view.

Please see numeric representations (straring from gape 11 in the paper (12 in the acrobat screen)):

http://www.geocities.com/complementarytheory/CATheory.pdf
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Anti-gravity Engine?

Organic,

The first thought come to mind after seeing CAT number system is that it looks like the design of an anti-gravity engine. How the potential mass and the kinetic mass are moving inside the engine. Their mutual interactions without destruction and constructive energy conservation.
This could be the solution for optimal problems in science and technology. One of these days I going to try to apply it to the construction of this anti-gravity engine. Thanks.

Antonio
 
  • #33
The algorithm to draw CAT's numbers is:

( It was written by stratman in https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=12436 )

For any n > 0, the following algorithm calculates the number of transitional states:

ASSOCIATION_LEVEL(int n):Vector

1 V:= new vector
2 if n = 1 then
3 V:=V + the single root of level 1
4 if n = 2 then
5 V:=V + the two roots of level 2
6 else
7 if n >2 then do
8 For each partition vector P in n do:
9 ROOTS(P,V)
10 return V

ROOTS(vector P,vector V)

1 roots :=[]
2 for each element in P do:
3 if element is a root then
4 roots:= roots + element
5 else
6 roots:=ASSOCIATION_LEVEL(integer value of element)
7 return horizontal alignment of the Cartesian product of P and draw new arc around them

By using Cartesian product we get some left-right structures that must be omitted from each [n] level.

You can use this algorithm here on [1] to [7]:

http://cyborg2000.xpert.com/ctheory/


About entropy:

Prime numbers are the anti-entropy structures because no first partition-level of them is settled down to equal parts (accept the first structure of the form 1*n).


Thank you.


Organic
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #34
Gravity Engine

Organic,

Once this anti-gravity engine becomes operational. You will share the monetary benefits from it. Thank you very much.

Antonio
 
  • #35
Dear Antonio I wish you good luck.

I believe that when you try to turn some model to reality,
only then you start to understand the deep meaning of it.

All the best.

Orgainc
 
Last edited:
  • #36
Thanks

organic,

Thanks for your infinite wisdom and encouragement.

Antonio
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K