I think that in Special Relativity, the drift of the perihelion can be calculated by cumulating elementary Lorentz transformations along the (Newtonian, unperturbed) trajectory. I read that the result of this calculation is much smaller than the experimental value.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

It is also well known that general Relativity produces the exact result, within the error bars.

My questions are:

What happened and what can we learn from that ?

How and why did GR perform better ?

Furthermore, is that not somehow in contradiction with the Equivalence Principle ? Could we not imagine that the EP applied to this system would imply the same result for both SR and GR ?

Thanks a lot for your feedback,

Michel

PS: I would also be interrested by a reference about these calculations, I am a bit lazy !

Specially about calculating the drift as a perturbation of the Newtonian case.

Can that really be done by Lorentz tranformations?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Perihelion drift in SR and in GR

Loading...

Similar Threads - Perihelion drift | Date |
---|---|

A Perihelion precession in GR using Robertson expansion | May 25, 2017 |

Perihelion shift in (very) near-circular orbits | Feb 27, 2016 |

Shift in Mercury's Perihelion by finite light speed | Sep 13, 2013 |

Perihelion precession of Mercury | Feb 10, 2011 |

Original papers on mercury's perihelion drift | Jan 26, 2007 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**