Period of a metal rod oscillating in a magnetic field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the period of a metal rod oscillating in a magnetic field, specifically addressing the torques acting on the rod and its moment of inertia. Participants explore the relationship between torque, moment of inertia, and angular displacement, ultimately deriving the equation of motion. The simplified approach involves treating the system as a pendulum under an effective gravitational force, leading to a more straightforward calculation of the oscillation period.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torque and moment of inertia
  • Familiarity with harmonic motion and simple pendulum dynamics
  • Knowledge of Lorentz force and its application in magnetic fields
  • Basic calculus for deriving equations of motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the equation of motion for oscillating systems
  • Learn about the application of effective forces in physics problems
  • Explore the principles of harmonic motion in greater detail
  • Investigate the effects of magnetic fields on conductive materials
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and engineers interested in the dynamics of oscillating systems, particularly those involving magnetic fields and conductive materials.

greg_rack
Gold Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
79
Homework Statement
A metal rod of length ##L=20cm## and mass ##m=80g## is hung with two conductive threads of length ##l=20cm## and set in a magnetic field of magnitude ##B=700mT## directed upwards.
When the rod carries a current of ##I=2.8A## it balances itself forming an angle ##\theta## with the vertical direction.
It the rod gets moved a little from its resting position, it will oscillate with a harmonic motion around that position
##\triangleright## Determine the period of those oscillations.
Relevant Equations
##T=\frac{1}{f}##
Harmonic motion laws
Lorentz's force equation
This problem honestly got me in big confusion.
I managed to find the angle ##\theta## at which the rod rests by equalling the components of weight and Lorentz's force... but from this point on I really don't know how to manage the harmonic oscillation part.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider an axis parallel to the rod, which passes through the two points at which the conductive threads are attached to the ceiling (or whatever).

What is the torque on the rod due to i) the two tension forces ii) the weight and iii) the magnetic force about this axis, when the rod is displaced by angle ##\varepsilon## from the equilibrium angle ##\theta_0##? What is the moment of inertia of the rod about this axis? [N.B. if you like, you can write the equation of motion in terms of ##\theta##, and then let ##\theta = \theta_0 + \varepsilon##]

Alternatively, you could think about defining an 'effective gravitational force', and tilting your head a little bit... that's a sneaker way :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny
etotheipi said:
Consider an axis parallel to the rod, which passes through the two points at which the conductive threads are attached to the ceiling (or whatever).

What is the torque on the rod due to i) the two tension forces ii) the weight and iii) the magnetic force about this axis, when the rod is displaced by angle ##\varepsilon## from the equilibrium angle ##\theta_0##? What is the moment of inertia of the rod about this axis? [N.B. if you like, you can write the equation of motion in terms of ##\theta##, and then let ##\theta = \theta_0 + \varepsilon##]

Alternatively, you could think about defining an 'effective gravitational force', and tilting your head a little bit... that's a sneaker way :wink:
I'm sorry but it's really a lot of time since I don't work with the moment of inertia... how could I relate that to torque and finally the period?
 
There's a long way and a short way to solve the problem (let's assume we can neglect any possible variation in current due to the change in flux linked by the configuration).

You can either write the ##\tau = I\ddot{\theta}## equation, namely$$-mgl\sin{\theta} + BILl \cos{\theta} = ml^2 \ddot{\theta}$$And then let ##\theta = \theta_0 + \varepsilon##, where ##\varepsilon## is the (small) angular displacement from the equilibrium position. Then, you can show using the double angle formula that ##\sin{(\theta_0 + \varepsilon)} \approx \sin{\theta_0} + \varepsilon \cos{\theta_0}## as well as ##\cos{(\theta_0 + \varepsilon)} = \cos{\theta_0} - \varepsilon \sin{\theta_0}##, and if you plug this in, and use that ##\ddot{\theta} = \ddot{\varepsilon}##, you'd find you end up with something in the SHM form.

However, there's a better way to solve the problem! Notice that a constant force of magnitude ##\sqrt{(mg)^2 + (BIL)^2}## acts on the bar, in a constant direction. If you tilt your head, then this is entirely equivalent to a simple pendulum swinging under the influence of an 'effective' gravitational acceleration ##\sqrt{g^2 + ((BIL)/m)^2}##! Does that suggest an easier solution?
 
etotheipi said:
Consider an axis parallel to the rod, which passes through the two points at which the conductive threads are attached to the ceiling (or whatever).

What is the torque on the rod due to i) the two tension forces ii) the weight and iii) the magnetic force about this axis, when the rod is displaced by angle ##\varepsilon## from the equilibrium angle ##\theta_0##? What is the moment of inertia of the rod about this axis? [N.B. if you like, you can write the equation of motion in terms of ##\theta##, and then let ##\theta = \theta_0 + \varepsilon##]

Alternatively, you could think about defining an 'effective gravitational force', and tilting your head a little bit... that's a sneaker way :wink:
I'm sorry for such a long delay in the response :)
Actually, I've opted for the easier way, considering the effective g on the rod and calculating the period such as a pendulum one!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi and TSny

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K