Person throws ball in elevator problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter CAF123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Elevator
Click For Summary
In the discussion about a person throwing a ball in an accelerating elevator, participants explore the dynamics of the ball's motion relative to both the person and the Earth. The main focus is on understanding the forces acting on the ball, particularly gravity and the elevator's acceleration. It is clarified that when the ball is released, it experiences only gravitational acceleration, while the hand's frame of reference is non-inertial due to the elevator's acceleration. Participants derive equations for the ball's velocity and position, emphasizing that the ball's acceleration appears greater than gravity when viewed from the hand's perspective. The conversation concludes with insights into how these principles relate to concepts in general relativity.
  • #31
Well, physically the non-inertial frame manifests itself by gravity greater than usual. Apart from this all the other properties of motion are normal.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
voko said:
Well, physically the non-inertial frame manifests itself by gravity greater than usual.

Could you explain a bit more what you mean here?
Many thanks
 
  • #33
What I mean is that the equation of "free fall" in the elevator frame is the same as in the Earth frame, except that the acceleration is g + a. So everything behaves as if the gravity were greater than "usual". Basically, you cannot say if it is the acceleration of the frame, or gravity that is not g. This will be important in your study of general relativity.
 
  • #34
Many thanks for all your help today.

Going back to my first question I posed in the OP: Imagine an elevator going down at constant acceleration a and another going down at constant deceleration a.

I would have thought that the normal forces acting on someone inside the elevator be different (normal for acc > normal for dec). But how can I show this mathematically?

In both cases, the velocity of the lift is downwards. Take positive y downwards then ma = mg -N => N = m(g-a). What would change for the other case to yield a different normal?
 
  • #35
The direction of motion (velocity) does not matter. The direction of acceleration does. As you say, the normal force is m(g - a). If a is positive (downward), then the force is smaller. If negative (upward), the force is greater. Which is in sync with intuition - my intuition, at least. I am not sure what else you would need to show.
 
  • #36
CAF123 said:
vel. of ball relative to earth: u + vo. Do I have to consider the velocity of the hand? The problem statement says the hand stays fixed.

Mans acceleration rel. to earth: a
Balls acceleration rel. to Earth = ##\frac{d}{dt} \left(u(t) + v_o \right)##, but I think the hand stays stationary, so acc. rel. to Earth =## \dot{u}##

Yes. You have to consider the initial velocity of the hand relative to the Earth (at time t = 0). Relative to the earth, the initial velocity of the hand is v0.

You got the man's acceleration relative to the Earth correct. But, the ball's acceleration relative to the Earth is minus g.

Are you familiar with the equation x=x_0+v_0t+\frac{1}{2}at^2?

Now all you have to do is write the corresponding equation for the location of the ball relative to the earth.
 
  • #37
Chestermiller said:
Yes. You have to consider the initial velocity of the hand relative to the Earth (at time t = 0). Relative to the earth, the initial velocity of the hand is v0.

You got the man's acceleration relative to the Earth correct. But, the ball's acceleration relative to the Earth is minus g.

Yes, I see that now (I was confusing my frames when I wrote this, in particular u(t) as voko pointed out)- I think I have done all the steps in my previous posts with the aid of voko and my answer is 11 posts above.
Thanks
 
  • #38
Yes. Sorry. I must have skipped over that previous post. Good job.

Chet
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K