voko
- 6,053
- 391
Well, physically the non-inertial frame manifests itself by gravity greater than usual. Apart from this all the other properties of motion are normal.
The discussion revolves around the physics problem of a person throwing a ball in an elevator that accelerates upwards with a constant acceleration 'a'. The key equations derived include the relationship between the velocities of the ball and the elevator, expressed as v(t) = at, and the acceleration of the ball relative to the man's hand, which is influenced by both gravity and the elevator's acceleration. The conclusion reached is that the ball experiences an effective acceleration of (g + a) when analyzed from the non-inertial frame of the elevator, leading to the understanding that the normal force acting on a person differs in scenarios of constant acceleration versus constant deceleration.
PREREQUISITESStudents of physics, particularly those studying mechanics, educators teaching classical mechanics concepts, and anyone interested in the applications of kinematics in non-inertial reference frames.
voko said:Well, physically the non-inertial frame manifests itself by gravity greater than usual.
CAF123 said:vel. of ball relative to earth: u + vo. Do I have to consider the velocity of the hand? The problem statement says the hand stays fixed.
Mans acceleration rel. to earth: a
Balls acceleration rel. to Earth = ##\frac{d}{dt} \left(u(t) + v_o \right)##, but I think the hand stays stationary, so acc. rel. to Earth =## \dot{u}##
Chestermiller said:Yes. You have to consider the initial velocity of the hand relative to the Earth (at time t = 0). Relative to the earth, the initial velocity of the hand is v0.
You got the man's acceleration relative to the Earth correct. But, the ball's acceleration relative to the Earth is minus g.