Person throws ball in elevator problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter CAF123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Elevator
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
37 replies · 6K views
Well, physically the non-inertial frame manifests itself by gravity greater than usual. Apart from this all the other properties of motion are normal.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
voko said:
Well, physically the non-inertial frame manifests itself by gravity greater than usual.

Could you explain a bit more what you mean here?
Many thanks
 
What I mean is that the equation of "free fall" in the elevator frame is the same as in the Earth frame, except that the acceleration is g + a. So everything behaves as if the gravity were greater than "usual". Basically, you cannot say if it is the acceleration of the frame, or gravity that is not g. This will be important in your study of general relativity.
 
Many thanks for all your help today.

Going back to my first question I posed in the OP: Imagine an elevator going down at constant acceleration a and another going down at constant deceleration a.

I would have thought that the normal forces acting on someone inside the elevator be different (normal for acc > normal for dec). But how can I show this mathematically?

In both cases, the velocity of the lift is downwards. Take positive y downwards then ma = mg -N => N = m(g-a). What would change for the other case to yield a different normal?
 
The direction of motion (velocity) does not matter. The direction of acceleration does. As you say, the normal force is m(g - a). If a is positive (downward), then the force is smaller. If negative (upward), the force is greater. Which is in sync with intuition - my intuition, at least. I am not sure what else you would need to show.
 
CAF123 said:
vel. of ball relative to earth: u + vo. Do I have to consider the velocity of the hand? The problem statement says the hand stays fixed.

Mans acceleration rel. to earth: a
Balls acceleration rel. to Earth = ##\frac{d}{dt} \left(u(t) + v_o \right)##, but I think the hand stays stationary, so acc. rel. to Earth =## \dot{u}##

Yes. You have to consider the initial velocity of the hand relative to the Earth (at time t = 0). Relative to the earth, the initial velocity of the hand is v0.

You got the man's acceleration relative to the Earth correct. But, the ball's acceleration relative to the Earth is minus g.

Are you familiar with the equation [itex]x=x_0+v_0t+\frac{1}{2}at^2[/itex]?

Now all you have to do is write the corresponding equation for the location of the ball relative to the earth.
 
Chestermiller said:
Yes. You have to consider the initial velocity of the hand relative to the Earth (at time t = 0). Relative to the earth, the initial velocity of the hand is v0.

You got the man's acceleration relative to the Earth correct. But, the ball's acceleration relative to the Earth is minus g.

Yes, I see that now (I was confusing my frames when I wrote this, in particular u(t) as voko pointed out)- I think I have done all the steps in my previous posts with the aid of voko and my answer is 11 posts above.
Thanks