voko
- 6,053
- 391
Well, physically the non-inertial frame manifests itself by gravity greater than usual. Apart from this all the other properties of motion are normal.
The problem involves a person throwing a ball upwards inside an elevator that is accelerating upwards. The objective is to determine the distance of the ball from the person's hand after it is thrown, while considering the effects of the elevator's motion. The discussion touches on concepts of relative motion and forces acting on the ball.
Participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about the assumptions made regarding the frame of reference and the forces acting on the ball. Some have suggested methods to express the ball's motion relative to the hand and the Earth, while others are clarifying the implications of treating the hand's frame as non-inertial.
There are ongoing discussions about the correct treatment of the ball's acceleration relative to the hand, and whether the initial upward velocity imparted by the hand affects the ball's subsequent motion under gravity. The distinction between inertial and non-inertial frames is also a point of contention.
voko said:Well, physically the non-inertial frame manifests itself by gravity greater than usual.
CAF123 said:vel. of ball relative to earth: u + vo. Do I have to consider the velocity of the hand? The problem statement says the hand stays fixed.
Mans acceleration rel. to earth: a
Balls acceleration rel. to Earth = ##\frac{d}{dt} \left(u(t) + v_o \right)##, but I think the hand stays stationary, so acc. rel. to Earth =## \dot{u}##
Chestermiller said:Yes. You have to consider the initial velocity of the hand relative to the Earth (at time t = 0). Relative to the earth, the initial velocity of the hand is v0.
You got the man's acceleration relative to the Earth correct. But, the ball's acceleration relative to the Earth is minus g.