Peskin & Schroeder QFT 5.6 Need help

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter philipke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Peskin Qft Schroeder
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around problem 5.6 (b) from Peskin and Schroeder's Quantum Field Theory, specifically focusing on the evaluation of terms involving gamma matrices in an amplitude calculation. Participants are seeking assistance with applying the Fierz identity to simplify expressions that include three gamma matrices.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant, Philip, expresses difficulty in simplifying an amplitude that includes terms with three gamma matrices and seeks guidance on using the Fierz identity from a previous problem.
  • Philip provides a specific expression involving gamma matrices and asks how to evaluate the first term in the numerator using the Fierz identity.
  • Another participant mentions obtaining a result that resembles a product of spinors and gamma matrices, indicating a potential next step in the calculation.
  • There is a request to remove the thread, suggesting a desire to discontinue the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion appears to be unresolved, with participants expressing different stages of understanding and progress on the problem without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific equations and identities from the text, indicating that their discussion is dependent on the definitions and context provided in Peskin and Schroeder's work. There are unresolved steps in the mathematical evaluation of the terms discussed.

philipke
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hey!

I need some help for problem 5.6 (b) in Peskin + Schroeder QFT. I can't get rid of the term including three gamma matrices in my amplitude.

I get two terms of the form:

\frac{-\gamma^{\nu}*\slash{k_2}*\gamma^{\mu} + 2\gamma^{\nu}p_1^{\mu}}{-2*p_1*k_2}

and the same with k_1 <-> k_2 and \nu <-> \mu.

How can I evaluate the first term in the numerator using the Fierz identiy from 5.3?

Thanks in advance!

Philip
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry here again the equation:

\bar{u_R}(p_2)\frac{-\gamma^{\nu}k_2\!\!\!/\gamma^{\mu} + 2\gamma^{\nu}p_1^{\mu}}{-2p_1k_2}u_R(p_1)

+ the same term with k_1 &lt;-&gt; k_2 and \mu &lt;-&gt; \nu

This is one factor in my amplitude (from the propagator). How can I apply the Fierz identity?

I could solve 5.3 adding 1 = \frac{1}{4}[\gamma_{\mu}]_{ab}[\gamma^{\mu}]_{ba}

and then apply the Fierz identity. The problem is that in 5.6 I get this term consisting of 3 matrices.
 
Last edited:
Well if I calculate a bit I get finally something like

<br /> k_1\!\!\!/u_R(p_1)\bar{u}_R(k_1)<br />

and further terms of that type. What can i do with that?
 
Please remove the thread!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
11K