Explore PF History: Wayback Machine Captures 1864 Snapshots From March 2001

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wrichik Basu
  • Start date Start date
Wrichik Basu
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,180
Reaction score
2,690
Just found that Wayback Machine has stored a snapshot of PF back on March 02, 2001:

http://web.archive.org/web/20010302050918/https://www.physicsforums.com:80/

In fact, it has about 1864 captures from March 2001!

And then a snapshot when PF was shifted to VBulletin (December 27, 2003):

http://web.archive.org/web/20031227195017/http://physicsforums.com:80/

And finally the shift to XenForo (snapshot taken around September or October 2014):

http://web.archive.org/web/20141008104733/https://www.physicsforums.com/

The old look certainly seems a bit awkward to members who have joined recently. Also, it should bring back some old memories of @Greg Bernhardt and the members who have been here since then. It shows how much the site has evolved to this date. Thanks to the hard work of the admin @Greg Bernhardt and his team of mentors.

In fact, could these pages be linked in the "About Us" insight page in PF?

Edit: such a thread exists already: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/visual-history-of-physics-forums.774923/ But I believe Wayback Machine has greater number of snapshots.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn, dlgoff, QuantumQuest and 5 others
Physics news on Phys.org
Wrichik Basu said:
In fact, could these pages be linked in the "About Us" insight page in PF?

Good idea! @anorlunda @Ibix

Wrichik Basu said:
It shows how much the site has evolved to this date

Even from the XF switch and we'll get another evolution in a couple months!

Wrichik Basu said:
But I believe Wayback Machine has greater number of snapshots.

Lots of snaps, but the thread shows some of the big changes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD, anorlunda and Wrichik Basu
Greg Bernhardt said:
Even from the XF switch and we'll get another evolution in a couple months
Suspense? Give some hints at least. You've been saying "Big things are planned for winter 2018" for a long time. Temperatures have already started dropping, so you should start revealing something too :nb)
 
Here's a thread from 2016 about the oldest thread...
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/first-thread-on-pf-was.889622/
  • possibly oldest available from the current website:
    https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/the-source-of-all-the-mind.18/
    from 2003

    member 2 starts a thread, with responses by member 7 and member 27

    upload_2018-11-26_2-35-42.png


 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-11-26_2-33-50.png
    upload_2018-11-26_2-33-50.png
    37.3 KB · Views: 623
  • upload_2018-11-26_2-35-42.png
    upload_2018-11-26_2-35-42.png
    29.2 KB · Views: 619
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu and davenn
robphy said:
This looks like the earliest archived thread
We had to start clean twice in the first few years. That is why those threads don't exist here.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
robphy said:
I am member 9587.
I'm member 4449. :oldbiggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
Member number 4, @Janus, is still active here.

(Greg as #1 as well, but that is something different)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff, Wrichik Basu and davenn
dlgoff said:
I'm member 4449. :oldbiggrin:
Says I'm "50" today, but I recall other member numbers for myself; can't have gotten in that early with a join date of 2003, or thereabouts. 2001-2003, and the membership moved only 50? I don't think so.
 
Bystander said:
Says I'm "50" today, but I recall other member numbers for myself; can't have gotten in that early with a join date of 2003, or thereabouts. 2001-2003, and the membership moved only 50? I don't think so.
We had to start clean twice between those years. After the second clean start those that were most active were the first to re-register.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff and Wrichik Basu
  • #10
Greg Bernhardt said:
After the second clean start
I'll buy that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff
  • #11
I have come back to PF after a significant gap, looks like political discussions are out. There was a "current affairs" section, before that there was "politics and world affairs" section. Now, it looks like PF is done with politics !
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
  • #12
Monsterboy said:
I have come back to PF after a significant gap, looks like political discussions are out. There was a "current affairs" section, before that there was "politics and world affairs" section. Now, it looks like PF is done with politics!
Absolutely gone. Politics and politicians are banned from PF (unless the latter are interested in science :wink: )
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Monsterboy
  • #13
Wrichik Basu said:
Absolutely gone. Politics and politicians are banned from PF (unless the latter are interested in science :wink: )
If only politicians could be banned from the rest of the world... :wink:
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu
  • #14
Monsterboy said:
I have come back to PF after a significant gap, looks like political discussions are out. There was a "current affairs" section, before that there was "politics and world affairs" section. Now, it looks like PF is done with politics !
Lots of physics though. Also biology if you can't handle the physics (I can't handle the physics)
I would not complain if they bring back the 1970s font on the home page in the future. Totally Space 1999.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Monsterboy
  • #15
Ibix said:
If only politicians could be banned from the rest of the world... :wink:
You are only looking at the people who are involved in active politics. But in the bigger picture, politics is everywhere - your office, university, school and sometimes even in your family. People are always trying to find ways to throw you into trouble, and if you don't have a politically sound mindset, you are likely to be lost in this world. That doesn't mean you have to put others into trouble, but you have to know the dark to abstain yourself from it. So, it's not politicians, it's politics that has to be banned. And banned from people's mind, not by enforcing laws.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Monsterboy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
975
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K