PF Member Photo Thread Archive

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion revolves around a member photo thread where participants share and critique their pictures. Users are encouraged to optimize their images for size and quality, with mentions of tools like GIMP and Photoshop for editing. The conversation includes playful banter and humorous remarks about each other's photos, showcasing a lighthearted community atmosphere. Notable contributions include various links to personal images and discussions about the challenges of posting online photos.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of image optimization techniques
  • Familiarity with photo editing software such as GIMP or Photoshop
  • Knowledge of online forum etiquette and posting guidelines
  • Awareness of digital image formats and their specifications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research image optimization techniques for web use
  • Explore advanced features of GIMP for photo editing
  • Learn about effective online community engagement strategies
  • Investigate best practices for sharing images on forums
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for online community members, casual photographers, and anyone interested in improving their digital photo sharing skills while engaging in a fun and supportive environment.

  • #4,111
@Dory

You are welcome!

I copy-pasted your post to quote you...perhaps that's why the link is not working (works in your original post though :-p)

Nice to know another physics gal here! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #4,112
Oh right...*smacks forehead*

Nice to know another physics gal here!
...and nice to be here :)
 
  • #4,113
Dory said:
Evo is a total pilf... physicists I'd like to (be)friend :) ! (the best wordplay I could find...deal with it!)

:smile::smile::smile:

Dory, I must admit I love your perverse sense of humor.

Edit: now you'll probably reply that it wasn't meant to be perverse at all, and I'll turn out a complete idiot. :biggrin:
 
  • #4,114
LOL - it was totally perverse! ;D glad you like it heh :)
 
  • #4,115
Dory has word play skills.
 
  • #4,116
Say that to Tiny Tim.
 
  • #4,117
Borek said:
Say that to Tiny Tim.

That's okay, I've removed the "just how tiny are you, tim?" part ;)
 
  • #4,118
Borek said:
Say that to Tiny Tim.

:smile:
 
  • #4,119
Evo said:
I think that was my best also.

Here is another avatar.

fd005d1.jpg
I dare say, this person is incapable of doing any harm.

Cute pic evo:-). You have a very welcoming and pleasant look to your person.
 
  • #4,120
I need an update already. Chopped my locks off.
 

Attachments

  • 2011-02-16 19-09-09.953.jpg
    2011-02-16 19-09-09.953.jpg
    20 KB · Views: 785
  • 2011-02-16 19-10-13.765.jpg
    2011-02-16 19-10-13.765.jpg
    19.8 KB · Views: 815
  • #4,121
Kurdt said:
I need an update already. Chopped my locks off.
Smile! :smile:
 
  • #4,123
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4,124
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4,125
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4,126
Lancelot59 said:
Nice photo. What does the watermark say?

That picture was stolen?
 
  • #4,127
Borek said:
That picture was stolen?

The plot thickens... Dun dun DAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!
Not necessarily...maybe she's a model too?
 
Last edited:
  • #4,128
Lancelot59 said:
The plot thickens... Dun dun DAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!
Not necessarily...maybe she's a model too?

I'd think photographers would only put watermarks on the photos they don't want to be stolen. I don't think there's any reason to put a watermark on the photo they'd give to the client, since they paid for them. I'm not sure, though.
 
  • #4,129
IMHO this is not picture of Amazon, this is picture someone took from some site and posted as its own in an attempt to spam the forums. My bet is we will never see Amazon again.

I can be wrong, but don't hold your breath.
 
  • #4,130
Borek said:
IMHO this is not picture of Amazon, this is picture someone took from some site and posted as its own in an attempt to spam the forums. My bet is we will never see Amazon again.

I can be wrong, but don't hold your breath.

That is a picture of me, and most of the photographers I've worked with put a small water mark in the corner. If you want some more proof I can post up some other pictures, heck I'm even on the home page of a website if you want the link. You my friend have been very wrong with all of the things you've said. And I will be posting stuff up on this forum, did you think that good looking girls don't have brains?
 
  • #4,131
Amazon said:
That is a picture of me, and post of the photographers I've worked with put a small water mark in the corner. If you want some pore proof I can post up some other pictures, heck I'm even on the home page of a website if you want. You my friend have been very wrong with all of the things you've said. And I will be posting stuff up on this forum, did you just think that good looking girls don't have brains?

Of course they do have brains Amazon, ask me! :biggrin:



... Why does April's fool come across my mind? :biggrin: :-p
 
  • #4,132
Amazon said:
That is a picture of me, and most of the photographers I've worked with put a small water mark in the corner. If you want some more proof I can post up some other pictures, heck I'm even on the home page of a website if you want the link. You my friend have been very wrong with all of the things you've said. And I will be posting stuff up on this forum, did you think that good looking girls don't have brains?

You obviously haven't met Evo.
 
  • #4,133
Amazon said:
did you think that good looking girls don't have brains?
Char. Limit said:
You obviously haven't met Evo.

Really char?
 
  • #4,134
jarednjames said:
Really char?

I'm a member of the Evo Cult. Problem?
 
  • #4,135
Char. Limit said:
I'm a member of the Evo Cult. Problem?

I meant, Amazon is saying good looking girls can have brains and the way your comment read to me was, "Evo proves good looking girls don't have brains".

Interpretation issues me thinks.
 
  • #4,136
Char. Limit said:
You obviously haven't met Evo.
Wait, that could be taken either way. :-p
 
  • #4,137
jarednjames said:
I meant, Amazon is saying good looking girls can have brains and the way your comment read to me was, "Evo proves good looking girls don't have brains".

Interpretation issues me thinks.

Nope. Other way around there buddy. Ya got to remove the "don't", you know?
 
  • #4,138
Char. Limit said:
Nope. Other way around there buddy. Ya got to remove the "don't", you know?

I'm a pessimist, always go for worst case, can never be disappointed then.
Evo said:
Wait, that could be taken either way. :-p

At least I'm not the only one.
 
  • #4,139
If you're talking about proofs, you'd better do them using ZFC.
 
  • #4,140
jhae2.718 said:
If you're talking about proofs, you'd better do them using ZFC.

I have my own special axioms:

1. The women of PhysicsForums are good looking.
3. The women of PhysicsForums are smart.

Therefore, it can be proven that Evo is good looking and smart.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K