PF Member Photo Thread Archive

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread revolves around members sharing personal photos, discussing their appearances, and engaging in light-hearted banter about each other's images. Participants express their willingness to post pictures, comment on the quality of photos, and make jokes about each other's looks. The scope includes casual sharing, humor, and some technical aspects regarding photo uploads.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Participants are encouraged to share their photos, with some expressing hesitation or waiting for better pictures.
  • Some members comment on the quality and age of their photos, with references to past hairstyles and graduation pictures.
  • There are humorous exchanges about the appearance of members, including playful insults and compliments.
  • Technical discussions arise regarding photo uploads and editing, with some members expressing a desire to learn more about forum features.
  • Several participants share links to their photos, while others express a desire for more flattering edits or modifications.
  • Some members joke about creating a separate thread for modified or humorous pictures, indicating a playful competitive spirit.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the fun nature of sharing photos, but there are multiple competing views on the quality and appropriateness of the images shared. The discussion remains playful and light-hearted, with no consensus on any serious topics.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about how to upload images and the technical limitations of the forum, indicating a need for clearer instructions or guidance.

Who May Find This Useful

This thread may be of interest to members looking to engage socially within the forum, share personal experiences, or learn about photo sharing and editing in an informal context.

  • #4,111
@Dory

You are welcome!

I copy-pasted your post to quote you...perhaps that's why the link is not working (works in your original post though :-p)

Nice to know another physics gal here! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #4,112
Oh right...*smacks forehead*

Nice to know another physics gal here!
...and nice to be here :)
 
  • #4,113
Dory said:
Evo is a total pilf... physicists I'd like to (be)friend :) ! (the best wordplay I could find...deal with it!)

:smile::smile::smile:

Dory, I must admit I love your perverse sense of humor.

Edit: now you'll probably reply that it wasn't meant to be perverse at all, and I'll turn out a complete idiot. :biggrin:
 
  • #4,114
LOL - it was totally perverse! ;D glad you like it heh :)
 
  • #4,115
Dory has word play skills.
 
  • #4,116
Say that to Tiny Tim.
 
  • #4,117
Borek said:
Say that to Tiny Tim.

That's okay, I've removed the "just how tiny are you, tim?" part ;)
 
  • #4,118
Borek said:
Say that to Tiny Tim.

:smile:
 
  • #4,119
Evo said:
I think that was my best also.

Here is another avatar.

fd005d1.jpg
I dare say, this person is incapable of doing any harm.

Cute pic evo:-). You have a very welcoming and pleasant look to your person.
 
  • #4,120
I need an update already. Chopped my locks off.
 

Attachments

  • 2011-02-16 19-09-09.953.jpg
    2011-02-16 19-09-09.953.jpg
    20 KB · Views: 788
  • 2011-02-16 19-10-13.765.jpg
    2011-02-16 19-10-13.765.jpg
    19.8 KB · Views: 818
  • #4,121
Kurdt said:
I need an update already. Chopped my locks off.
Smile! :smile:
 
  • #4,123
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4,124
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4,125
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4,126
Lancelot59 said:
Nice photo. What does the watermark say?

That picture was stolen?
 
  • #4,127
Borek said:
That picture was stolen?

The plot thickens... Dun dun DAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!
Not necessarily...maybe she's a model too?
 
Last edited:
  • #4,128
Lancelot59 said:
The plot thickens... Dun dun DAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!
Not necessarily...maybe she's a model too?

I'd think photographers would only put watermarks on the photos they don't want to be stolen. I don't think there's any reason to put a watermark on the photo they'd give to the client, since they paid for them. I'm not sure, though.
 
  • #4,129
IMHO this is not picture of Amazon, this is picture someone took from some site and posted as its own in an attempt to spam the forums. My bet is we will never see Amazon again.

I can be wrong, but don't hold your breath.
 
  • #4,130
Borek said:
IMHO this is not picture of Amazon, this is picture someone took from some site and posted as its own in an attempt to spam the forums. My bet is we will never see Amazon again.

I can be wrong, but don't hold your breath.

That is a picture of me, and most of the photographers I've worked with put a small water mark in the corner. If you want some more proof I can post up some other pictures, heck I'm even on the home page of a website if you want the link. You my friend have been very wrong with all of the things you've said. And I will be posting stuff up on this forum, did you think that good looking girls don't have brains?
 
  • #4,131
Amazon said:
That is a picture of me, and post of the photographers I've worked with put a small water mark in the corner. If you want some pore proof I can post up some other pictures, heck I'm even on the home page of a website if you want. You my friend have been very wrong with all of the things you've said. And I will be posting stuff up on this forum, did you just think that good looking girls don't have brains?

Of course they do have brains Amazon, ask me! :biggrin:



... Why does April's fool come across my mind? :biggrin: :-p
 
  • #4,132
Amazon said:
That is a picture of me, and most of the photographers I've worked with put a small water mark in the corner. If you want some more proof I can post up some other pictures, heck I'm even on the home page of a website if you want the link. You my friend have been very wrong with all of the things you've said. And I will be posting stuff up on this forum, did you think that good looking girls don't have brains?

You obviously haven't met Evo.
 
  • #4,133
Amazon said:
did you think that good looking girls don't have brains?
Char. Limit said:
You obviously haven't met Evo.

Really char?
 
  • #4,134
jarednjames said:
Really char?

I'm a member of the Evo Cult. Problem?
 
  • #4,135
Char. Limit said:
I'm a member of the Evo Cult. Problem?

I meant, Amazon is saying good looking girls can have brains and the way your comment read to me was, "Evo proves good looking girls don't have brains".

Interpretation issues me thinks.
 
  • #4,136
Char. Limit said:
You obviously haven't met Evo.
Wait, that could be taken either way. :-p
 
  • #4,137
jarednjames said:
I meant, Amazon is saying good looking girls can have brains and the way your comment read to me was, "Evo proves good looking girls don't have brains".

Interpretation issues me thinks.

Nope. Other way around there buddy. Ya got to remove the "don't", you know?
 
  • #4,138
Char. Limit said:
Nope. Other way around there buddy. Ya got to remove the "don't", you know?

I'm a pessimist, always go for worst case, can never be disappointed then.
Evo said:
Wait, that could be taken either way. :-p

At least I'm not the only one.
 
  • #4,139
If you're talking about proofs, you'd better do them using ZFC.
 
  • #4,140
jhae2.718 said:
If you're talking about proofs, you'd better do them using ZFC.

I have my own special axioms:

1. The women of PhysicsForums are good looking.
3. The women of PhysicsForums are smart.

Therefore, it can be proven that Evo is good looking and smart.
 

Similar threads

Photo Contest - Simple Harmonic Motion (5/2-5/8)
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Photo Contest - Electricity (1/4-1/10)
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Photo Contest - Obtuse Angle (11/16-11/22)
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K