PF Member Photo Thread Archive

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
Sign up Log in
4,578 replies · 992K views
@Dory

You are welcome!

I copy-pasted your post to quote you...perhaps that's why the link is not working (works in your original post though :-p)

Nice to know another physics gal here! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh right...*smacks forehead*

Nice to know another physics gal here!
...and nice to be here :)
 
Dory said:
Evo is a total pilf... physicists I'd like to (be)friend :) ! (the best wordplay I could find...deal with it!)

:smile::smile::smile:

Dory, I must admit I love your perverse sense of humor.

Edit: now you'll probably reply that it wasn't meant to be perverse at all, and I'll turn out a complete idiot. :biggrin:
 
LOL - it was totally perverse! ;D glad you like it heh :)
 
Borek said:
Say that to Tiny Tim.

That's okay, I've removed the "just how tiny are you, tim?" part ;)
 
Borek said:
Say that to Tiny Tim.

:smile:
 
Evo said:
I think that was my best also.

Here is another avatar.

fd005d1.jpg
I dare say, this person is incapable of doing any harm.

Cute pic evo:-). You have a very welcoming and pleasant look to your person.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lancelot59 said:
Nice photo. What does the watermark say?

That picture was stolen?
 
Borek said:
That picture was stolen?

The plot thickens... Dun dun DAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!
Not necessarily...maybe she's a model too?
 
Last edited:
Lancelot59 said:
The plot thickens... Dun dun DAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!
Not necessarily...maybe she's a model too?

I'd think photographers would only put watermarks on the photos they don't want to be stolen. I don't think there's any reason to put a watermark on the photo they'd give to the client, since they paid for them. I'm not sure, though.
 
IMHO this is not picture of Amazon, this is picture someone took from some site and posted as its own in an attempt to spam the forums. My bet is we will never see Amazon again.

I can be wrong, but don't hold your breath.
 
Borek said:
IMHO this is not picture of Amazon, this is picture someone took from some site and posted as its own in an attempt to spam the forums. My bet is we will never see Amazon again.

I can be wrong, but don't hold your breath.

That is a picture of me, and most of the photographers I've worked with put a small water mark in the corner. If you want some more proof I can post up some other pictures, heck I'm even on the home page of a website if you want the link. You my friend have been very wrong with all of the things you've said. And I will be posting stuff up on this forum, did you think that good looking girls don't have brains?
 
Amazon said:
That is a picture of me, and post of the photographers I've worked with put a small water mark in the corner. If you want some pore proof I can post up some other pictures, heck I'm even on the home page of a website if you want. You my friend have been very wrong with all of the things you've said. And I will be posting stuff up on this forum, did you just think that good looking girls don't have brains?

Of course they do have brains Amazon, ask me! :biggrin:



... Why does April's fool come across my mind? :biggrin: :-p
 
Amazon said:
That is a picture of me, and most of the photographers I've worked with put a small water mark in the corner. If you want some more proof I can post up some other pictures, heck I'm even on the home page of a website if you want the link. You my friend have been very wrong with all of the things you've said. And I will be posting stuff up on this forum, did you think that good looking girls don't have brains?

You obviously haven't met Evo.
 
Amazon said:
did you think that good looking girls don't have brains?
Char. Limit said:
You obviously haven't met Evo.

Really char?
 
jarednjames said:
Really char?

I'm a member of the Evo Cult. Problem?
 
Char. Limit said:
I'm a member of the Evo Cult. Problem?

I meant, Amazon is saying good looking girls can have brains and the way your comment read to me was, "Evo proves good looking girls don't have brains".

Interpretation issues me thinks.
 
jarednjames said:
I meant, Amazon is saying good looking girls can have brains and the way your comment read to me was, "Evo proves good looking girls don't have brains".

Interpretation issues me thinks.

Nope. Other way around there buddy. Ya got to remove the "don't", you know?
 
Char. Limit said:
Nope. Other way around there buddy. Ya got to remove the "don't", you know?

I'm a pessimist, always go for worst case, can never be disappointed then.
Evo said:
Wait, that could be taken either way. :-p

At least I'm not the only one.
 
If you're talking about proofs, you'd better do them using ZFC.
 
jhae2.718 said:
If you're talking about proofs, you'd better do them using ZFC.

I have my own special axioms:

1. The women of PhysicsForums are good looking.
3. The women of PhysicsForums are smart.

Therefore, it can be proven that Evo is good looking and smart.
 

Similar threads

Is a Member Photo Thread 2.0 Needed?
  • DaveC426913
  • · Replies 20 ·
  • Feedback and Announcements
Replies
20