- 7,207
- 25
Moonbear said:Try scotch!![]()
Is there any other way to have ice ??

Moonbear said:Try scotch!![]()
Gokul43201 said:No. It's what you should be looking for !![]()
Gokul43201 said:Well done Moonbear.
This is THE END, I guess.
chroot said:I'm actually considering making my own. Too bad there wasn't more interest. I think it was one of the neatest things I've ever seen on PF.
Unfortunately, I think I will have a hard time making mine non-technical.
- Warren
arildno said:I think it was great, but it moved too fast for snails like myself..![]()
chroot said:I was considering writing a php script that would show my clues only at specific intervals, say, one clue per 3 hrs. or so. I'm designing one that is quite a bit more technological/scientific/problem-solving oriented. Are you interested in a techie hunt, Moonbear?
- Warren
Moonbear said:I'm very amused that Gokul managed to create his own conspirator. When I asked about conspirators, that certainly wasn't what I meant. I thought he may have had an admin or mentor on his side to go back and edit threads older threads in order to insert clues without risking them getting noticed by someone quoting them.
Oh, just want to add one more thought on getting more participation. Perhaps something as simple as starting the game near the end of the week and into a weekend would work better than starting at the beginning of the week. More folks around who can spend some time time playing if it's a weekend and they aren't supposed to be at work or spending their nights doing homework, etc.
I wasn't anticipating actual complete C code -- I was thinking more along the lines of simple pseudocode, like this:Moonbear said:I guess it depends on how techie it is.As I pointed out to Gokul, I'm a biologist, not a mathematician (mean is one word, not two in my vocabulary)...and I'm definitely not a computer programmer. So, if I need to write programs or understand code to solve puzzles, I won't do very well. Then again, if you throw some of those types of clues in with others like Gokuls that required knowledge of how to search PF, then that would be okay, the technical parts I'd just have to leave for the other game players.
There are an astonishing array of tricks I could use. I am currently devising my treasure hunt plan, and I have put some serious thought into using these tricks. I can pretty much make anything I want appear anywhere I want. I can embed hidden statements inside other people's posts without even showing an edited message, I can change people's join dates, user ids, post ids, anything I want. It would be really easy to make a treasure hunt with all those tools available to me.Since you're the code wizard behind PF, are there tricks you can employ that us mere mortals couldn't even dream? Such as making an old deleted thread reappear with now embedded clues?
Except, I can still see you.And now that I know Gokul was watching my every move, and that means other treasure hunters could be doing the same, I'll have to remember to turn myself invisible for the next hunt!
Can you think of a way around the time zone issue?hemmul said:Huh, good job Gokul! You're the MAN!![]()
Unfortunately i didn't have an opportunity to participate, because, due to my timezone the main part of discussions was held when i was sleepingbut anyway i can't forget myself scanning the list of new members starting from member.php?u=17950+ down to 17700+ while trying to find profile of /already/ famous for3to0won :D argh this was evil
...
Looking forward for chroot's challenge!![]()
![]()
chroot said:Can you think of a way around the time zone issue?
- Warren
chroot said:Can you think of a way around the time zone issue?
- Warren
chroot said:I just thought of a much easier way to deal with time zones. Offer perhaps four independent threads, one for each region of 6 time zones. People would just have to use the honor system to avoid peeking at the solutions in the threads for time zones ahead of them.
- Warren
You make a good point. Perhaps this is the best way. Unfortunately, people naturally want to compete to be the first to answer a question. If we declare that treasure hunts are just for fun and the admin will not declare winners, then perhaps this is a fine policy.TenaliRaman said:2 ... make a condition that one can post an answer to the clue only after say 24 hours of posting the clue .. this prolly gives everyone a chance to view the clue ...
Just a thought.chroot said:And really, you have two mutually exclusive choices:
1) Make all discussion open for all hunters.
2) Make the competition fair for people in all time zones.
Which one is a better choice?
- Warren
chroot said:I wasn't anticipating actual complete C code -- I was thinking more along the lines of simple pseudocode, like this:
SET X = 1
REPEAT TEN TIMES {
ADD 1 TO X
}
Which I think most people can logically understand even if they don't know how to program a computer.
There are an astonishing array of tricks I could use. I am currently devising my treasure hunt plan, and I have put some serious thought into using these tricks. I can pretty much make anything I want appear anywhere I want. I can embed hidden statements inside other people's posts without even showing an edited message, I can change people's join dates, user ids, post ids, anything I want. It would be really easy to make a treasure hunt with all those tools available to me.
On the other hand, is that fair? Should I really design a treasure hunt that no one else on the site but Greg could design? I think it might be more fair if I only use the member tools. That way, other people (besides Greg) could follow in my footsteps.
Except, I can still see you.![]()
chroot said:You make a good point. Perhaps this is the best way. Unfortunately, people naturally want to compete to be the first to answer a question. If we declare that treasure hunts are just for fun and the admin will not declare winners, then perhaps this is a fine policy.
- Warren
Moonbear said:Maybe you could work out a way that it's sort of like a relay race, where one person isn't allowed to solve the entire puzzle, but has to solve only one part at a time and then pass it on to another participant to have it count. In other words, the way I solved the final clue wouldn't be allowed. Even if I found the whole solution, I'd have to just give one part, and hope someone else playing would pick it up from there, and when the next step was solved, then I could jump back in with a third step, but not sooner. This way it's more of a passing game than a ball-hogging game.
Moonbear said:(I know I've warned you all I'm a geek...surely this has sunken in by now).
Ahem... That's Moonbear Poirot MADAME!TenaliRaman said:Moonbear Poirot Sir,
Math Is Hard said:Ahem... That's Moonbear Poirot MADAME!