PGRE question: angular freq of small oscillations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the angular frequency of small oscillations for a particle in a potential defined by V(x) = -ax² + bx⁴, where a and b are positive constants. The correct angular frequency is established as 2(√(a/m)). A common misconception arises when substituting a = -1/2 k and b = 0, leading to confusion regarding the harmonic oscillator formula √(k/m). The flaw in this logic is clarified by noting that a cannot be negative when both a and b are positive, which affects the oscillatory behavior of the system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics, specifically harmonic oscillators
  • Familiarity with potential energy functions and their characteristics
  • Basic calculus for analyzing minima and maxima of functions
  • Knowledge of angular frequency and its derivation in oscillatory systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of angular frequency in non-linear oscillators
  • Explore the implications of potential energy shapes on oscillatory motion
  • Learn about stability analysis in potential wells
  • Investigate the role of positive and negative constants in potential functions
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone studying classical mechanics, particularly those focusing on oscillatory motion and potential energy analysis.

Aziza
Messages
189
Reaction score
1
Problem from past PGRE:

A particle of mass m moves in a one-dimensional potential V(x)=-ax2 + bx4, where a and b are positive constants. The angular frequency of small oscillations about the minima of the potential is equal to:

Answer is 2(a/m)1/2.

I understand how this is found 'the long way' by actually applying calculus, but if you plug in a=-1/2 k and b=0 shouldn't you get back sqrt(k/m) ? Because the harmonic potential is 1/2kx^2 ... so where is the flaw in my logic?Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Aziza said:
Problem from past PGRE:

A particle of mass m moves in a one-dimensional potential V(x)=-ax2 + bx4, where a and b are positive constants. The angular frequency of small oscillations about the minima of the potential is equal to:

Answer is 2(a/m)1/2.

I understand how this is found 'the long way' by actually applying calculus, but if you plug in a=-1/2 k, shouldn't you get back sqrt(k/m) ? Because the harmonic potential is 1/2kx^2 ... so where is the flaw in my logic?


Thanks!

If the potential was 1/2 kx2+bx4, there would be oscillation about x=0. But the problem says that both a and b are positive constants. So a can not be equal to -1/2 k where k is positive.

In case a>0 and b>0, the potential function has maximum at x=0. You do not get oscillatory motion about x=0. The minima are at x=±√(a/2b). Oscillatory motion is possible about a minimum of the potential function.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
8K