Phase difference between 2 points on a wave

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the phase difference between two points on a wave, focusing on the relationship between wavelength, frequency, and phase difference. Participants explore the implications of phase values exceeding 2π radians and the proper interpretation of phase difference in wave mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of wavelength and phase difference, questioning whether phase differences should be constrained to less than 2π radians. Some suggest that exceeding 2π is acceptable if properly defined, while others emphasize the importance of precision in calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing different perspectives on the definition and calculation of phase difference. Some guidance has been offered regarding the treatment of phase values greater than 2π, and the need for high precision in calculations has been highlighted.

Contextual Notes

There are ongoing debates about the appropriate way to express phase differences and the implications of rounding in calculations. Participants are considering the effects of using whole wavelengths in their calculations.

Bolter
Messages
262
Reaction score
31
Homework Statement
Calculate the phase difference
Relevant Equations
See below
Screenshot 2020-03-07 at 13.07.07.png

So to do this problem I need the relevant formula for phase difference which is this:

Screenshot 2020-03-07 at 13.09.46.png

I first need to find wavelength and this is lambda = velocity/frequency

So lambda = 257/641 = 0.40093603744 m
Hence phase difference (in radians) = 2pi * (2/0.40093603744) = 31.3 rads

My concern is that doesn't the phase difference always have to be less than 2pi radians? i.e. the path difference must always be less than the wavelength?

I know that exactly 4 wavelengths fit exactly into 2 meters and then you have 0.39625585 m left over. So should 0.39625585m be the path difference, thus the phase difference then becomes

phase difference = 2pi * (0.39625585/0.40093603744) = 6.2 radians

Any help would be really great! Thanks a lot
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say that 257/641=0.401. Assuming we have the data to three significant figures.
 
Last edited:
Bolter said:
My concern is that doesn't the phase difference always have to be less than 2pi radians?

Yes, that is correct. However, it is perfectly reasonable to get more than 2pi. You can go around a circle many times and still answer the question “how far have you moved around the circle from where you started?” You just have to subtract all the complete circles. Subtract the largest possible multiple of 2pi, and that’s the phase.

Now, knowing that, people sometimes casually use the word “phase” without subtracting. “Passing through 4 mm of glass the wave accumulates 11,000 waves of phase.” But when you are asked what is “the phase” or “the phase difference” the answer should be the proper definition: the extra part after subtracting any complete waves.
 
P.S.: since the phase is the residual after subtracting what sometimes is a large number of waves, the calculation needs high precision. Don’t round off anything until you get to the final answer.
 
Cutter Ketch said:
Yes, that is correct. However, it is perfectly reasonable to get more than 2pi. You can go around a circle many times and still answer the question “how far have you moved around the circle from where you started?” You just have to subtract all the complete circles. Subtract the largest possible multiple of 2pi, and that’s the phase.

Now, knowing that, people sometimes casually use the word “phase” without subtracting. “Passing through 4 mm of glass the wave accumulates 11,000 waves of phase.” But when you are asked what is “the phase” or “the phase difference” the answer should be the proper definition: the extra part after subtracting any complete waves.

So either one of 31.3 or 6.2 rads is acceptable for the phase difference then. But of course 6.2 rad is a more suitable value as it’s line with taking into account the extra part of the wave after subtracting all number of complete waves. It corresponds to what the definition of phase difference is
 
Cutter Ketch said:
P.S.: since the phase is the residual after subtracting what sometimes is a large number of waves, the calculation needs high precision. Don’t round off anything until you get to the final answer.

I have kept everything to a high precision when entering it onto the calculator. I rounded both my values to 1 decimal place to get 31.3 and 6.2 rads
 
I take a different view.
There is no point stating a phase difference with a magnitude greater than 2 pi. The number of wavelengths is (2m)(641Hz)/(257m/s). Take the difference from the nearest whole number and then multiply by 2π.
 
haruspex said:
I take a different view.
There is no point stating a phase difference with a magnitude greater than 2 pi. The number of wavelengths is (2m)(641Hz)/(257m/s). Take the difference from the nearest whole number and then multiply by 2π.

Different view? I believe that is consistent with what I said. I said people sometimes casually use the word “phase” to refer to the whole enchilada, but the proper definition is just the angle within 2pi.
 
Cutter Ketch said:
Different view?
From that in posts #5 and #6.
But also, by working in wavelengths first, it is not necessary to plug in the value of pi to high precision - not that that is at all arduous given that it will be supplied to great precision by the calculator.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
902
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K