I Phase space integral in noninteracting dipole system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a system of N noninteracting electric point dipoles in an external field, focusing on the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations. It raises a question about the integration of cyclic momenta conjugate to the spherical angles, specifically whether they should be included in the partition function calculation. Concerns are expressed regarding the potential divergence of the integral due to the momenta being defined over positive real values. The conversation also touches on the use of polar coordinates in both coordinate and momentum spaces to analyze the phase space. Clarification is sought on the treatment of these momenta in the context of statistical mechanics and partition functions.
raisins
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

Consider a system of ##N## noninteracting, identical electric point dipoles (dipole moment ##\vec{\mu}##) subjected to an external field ##\vec{E}=E\hat{z}##. The Lagrangian for this system is
$$L=T-V=\sum_{i=1}^N\left\{\frac{m\dot{\vec{r}_i}^2}{2}+\vec{\mu}_i\cdot\vec{E}\right\}=\sum_{i=1}^N\left\{\frac{m\dot{\vec{r}_i}^2}{2}+E\mu\cos\theta_i\right\}$$
and the Hamiltonian is
$$H=\sum_{i=1}^N\left\{\frac{\vec{p}_i^2}{2m}-E\mu\cos\theta_i\right\}$$
As I see it, 5 sets of generalized coordinates ##\left(\left\{\vec{r}_i\right\},\left\{\theta_i\right\},\left\{\phi_i\right\}\right)##, where ##\theta_i,\phi_i## are the usual spherical angles, are needed to describe this system. Now, the momenta conjugate to ##\theta_i,\phi_i## (call them ##p_{\theta_i},p_{\phi_i}##) are both cyclic, since ##\dot{\theta}_i,\dot{\phi}_i## appear nowhere in the Lagrangian. But do we not still have to integrate over them to find the partition function; ie.
$$Z=\frac{1}{N!}\int \prod_{i=1}^N\frac{d^3\vec{r}_id^3\vec{p}_i}{h^3}\,\frac{d\theta_idp_{\theta_i}}{h}\,\frac{d\phi_idp_{\phi_i}}{h}e^{-\beta H}$$
But ##p_{\theta_i},p_{\phi_i}\in[0,\infty)## so doesn't that integral blow up? Am I wrong in thinking ##p_{\theta_i},p_{\phi_i}## can take any real, positive value? Or, because they're cyclic, do we just omit them from the integration?

Any help would be appreciated, thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not familiar with momenta conjugate. Taking polar coordinate for both coordinate and momenta spaces
dv=r^2 sin^2\theta dr d\theta d\phi
dV=R^2 sin^2\Theta dR d\Theta d\Phi
where I noted small r for coordinate space and capital R for momentum space.
So in total number of states in infinitesimal phase space elements is
\frac{\prod_{i=1}^N dv_idV_i}{h^{3N}}
 
Last edited:
raisins said:
But ##p_{\theta_i},p_{\phi_i}\in[0,\infty)## s
From where this comes from?
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top