I Phase Speed of Wave in non-relativistic Doppler Shift Derivation

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, the relationship between the frequency and wavelength of sound waves is examined, particularly in the context of a moving siren and a stationary observer. The derived formula for the observed frequency, accounting for the Doppler effect, shows that the frequency measured by the observer is affected by the speed of the source relative to the medium. The question arises about why the wavelength at the source, ##\lambda_0##, equals ##\frac{v_w}{f_0}##, despite expectations from Galilean transformation. The resolution lies in recognizing that both the observer and the emitter are at rest relative to the air, leading to the same wave speed measurement. This understanding clarifies the consistency in wave speed across different reference frames in this scenario.
unified
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
The phase speed of a wave in the derivation of the non-relativistic Doppler shift does not change between reference frames. Shouldn't the Galilean transformation apply?
Consider the situation where an observer at rest on the ground measures the frequency of a siren which is moving away from the observer at speed ##v_{Ex}##. Let ##v_w## be the speed of the sound wave. Let ##\lambda_0##, ##f_0##, ##\lambda_D##, and ##f_D## be the wavelengths and frequencies measured by the emitter and ground observer. Let T be the wave's period measured by the ground observer. Following the standard non-relativistic doppler shift derivation, ##f_D## = ##\frac{v_w}{\lambda_D}## = ##\frac{v_w}{\lambda_0 + v_{Ex}T}## = ##\frac{v_w}{\frac{v_w}{f_0} + \frac{v_{Ex}}{f_0}}## = ##\frac{f_0}{1 + \frac{v_{Ex}}{v_w}}##.

My question, is why is ##\lambda_0## = ##\frac{v_w}{f_0}##? If the wave speed on the ground is ##v_w##, shouldn't the wave speed as measured by the emitter be calculated using the Galilean transformation? Instead it is the same value as measured by the ground observer.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
To answer my own question, we are comparing the frequency measured by the ground observer -- who is at rest relative to the medium air -- with that measured by an observer moving with the siren and at rest relative to the air. Since they are both at rest relative to the air, they will measure the sound to have the same speed ##v_w##.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
64
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top