PhD in Germany vs USA: IIT Roorkee Physics Student

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the decision-making process for a final year Masters student from IIT Roorkee, India, who has received PhD admits from Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) in Germany and the University of Illinois Chicago (UIC) in the USA. Key points include the lack of coursework in Germany, allowing for a quicker completion of the PhD, and concerns about funding and living costs in the USA. Participants emphasize the importance of thorough research and caution against the perception that a PhD is merely a race to completion, advocating for a focus on learning opportunities instead.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of PhD program structures in Germany and the USA
  • Familiarity with funding mechanisms for graduate studies
  • Knowledge of the CMS collaboration at CERN
  • Awareness of the job market dynamics for PhD graduates in both regions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the PhD program requirements at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
  • Investigate funding options and assistantship stipulations at the University of Illinois Chicago (UIC)
  • Explore the implications of language barriers in German academic settings
  • Examine the dropout rates and job placement statistics for PhD graduates in the USA
USEFUL FOR

Prospective PhD students, particularly those in physics or related fields, as well as academic advisors and individuals considering graduate studies in Germany versus the USA.

Dhanush Hanga;
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am a final year Masters student studying physics at IIT Roorkee, India. I have PhD admits in experimental high energy physics from Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Germany and University of Illinois Chicago, USA. I have previously done an internship as an undergrad with a professor at KIT. Both the labs are working in collaboration with CMS. Which one should I choose and why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CMS is at CERN, so as a practical matter, it would be less of a hassle to travel between Karlsruhe and Geneva than between Chicago and Geneva.
 
In Germany you would not have to do coursework and could get finished with the PhD quicker.
 
cgk said:
In Germany you would not have to do coursework and could get finished with the PhD quicker.

But I think admission is much harder in general.
 
Thanks for the replies. I do not speak German, but that didn't seem like a problem when I was pursuing my internship. I know that I have to take up coursework in the US but it is worth it right?
 
No. USA is a terrible place to go to graduate school. There is no money here despite what people may tell you. Go to Germany.
 
If your admission letter says you will receive an assistantship or fellowship, there is money for you, despite what HuskyNamedNala will tell you.
 
Well, despite what Vanadium 50 will tell you, that fund might not cover your cost of living. A very good stipend is only 20 grand a year. And unless your contract gaurentees it for all 4 years, funding is on a semester by semester basis.

The point is, do your research carefully and ignore the hype.
 
  • #10
HuskyNamedNala said:
Well, despite what Vanadium 50 will tell you, that fund might not cover your cost of living

I said nothing about this one way or the other - how could I, when I don't have the letter in front of me? Sticking words in my mouth is a cheap form of debate. Face it, you got caught exaggerating.
 
  • #11
cgk said:
In Germany you would not have to do coursework and could get finished with the PhD quicker.

Would you not want to do some coursework...? o_O
 
  • #12
Brian T said:
Would you not want to do some coursework...?

There seems to be a prevalent view that a PhD is a race, and the faster you get to the finish line, the better. I don't understand this - the point is to take advantage of the opportunities and learn what you can. You will, of course, be continually learning throughout your career, but this becomes harder and harder the farther you go, as you will have less and less time.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Brian T
  • #13
Vanadium 50 said:
There seems to be a prevalent view that a PhD is a race, and the faster you get to the finish line, the better. I don't understand this - the point is to take advantage of the opportunities and learn what you can. You will, of course, be continually learning throughout your career, but this becomes harder and harder the farther you go, as you will have less and less time.

Treating the PhD as a race seems rather prevalent in Europe, especially in Germany.

Perhaps European job markets value time-to-degree more than US job markets...
 
  • #14
Isn't it something like bachelor's degree in 3 years, master's degree in 2 years and then a PhD in 3 years ?

I think that's the main road to get a PhD in Europe. We don't have undergraduate for 4 years and then master+PhD for 4-5 years. Unless I am wrong, one needs to have a master's degree to start a PhD.
 
  • #15
andreyw said:
Unless I am wrong, one needs to have a master's degree to start a PhD.
You are correct. And Dhanush explicitly stated that he/she is going to obtain a master's, soon.
 
  • #16
Timo said:
You are correct. And Dhanush explicitly stated that he/she is going to obtain a master's, soon.

I've heard differently. My Geophysics teacher got her PHD without obtaining a masters. She kinda 'did them both together' and got a complimentary masters.

Thread starter, if you decide to go to UIC in Chicago, then I'd love to meet you and perhaps have you help me on my journey! But the PhD to Germany does sound like a nice option based on other people's post here.
 
  • #17
Vanadium 50 said:
There seems to be a prevalent view that a PhD is a race, and the faster you get to the finish line, the better. I don't understand this - the point is to take advantage of the opportunities and learn what you can. You will, of course, be continually learning throughout your career, but this becomes harder and harder the farther you go, as you will have less and less time.

Well if you can get the degree in 3 years vs 6-8 years I think the 3 years is a much better option when the degree is what will allow you to start actually working instead of stuck in a PhD program without a clear way out.
 
  • #18
Vanadium 50 said:
I said nothing about this one way or the other - how could I, when I don't have the letter in front of me? Sticking words in my mouth is a cheap form of debate. Face it, you got caught exaggerating.

No, this is simple. By stating:

"If your admission letter says you will receive an assistantship or fellowship, there is money for you"

You leave out a very important caveat that the funding might not be enough or may come with stipulations that require you to reapply every semester. In Germany and other more developed nations, students don't have to worry about these things. I'm not even going to go into the probability of obtaining a good assistantship (one that doesn't require you to teach for an intrusive amount of hours, fully waives tuition, and provides a stipend of at least $700/week) or a fellowship that pays a reasonable wage. It drives me crazy when academics give blatantly bad advice to aspiring graduate students, yet wonder why the dropout rate is about 50% for American PhD programs. You can be the best student and most brilliant researcher, but if you can't afford food you what's the point? Here is a quote from the Economist

Proponents of the PhD argue that it is worthwhile even if it does not lead to permanent academic employment. Not every student embarks on a PhD wanting a university career and many move successfully into private-sector jobs in, for instance, industrial research. That is true; but drop-out rates suggest that many students become dispirited. In America only 57% of doctoral students will have a PhD ten years after their first date of enrolment. In the humanities, where most students pay for their own PhDs, the figure is 49%. Worse still, whereas in other subject areas students tend to jump ship in the early years, in the humanities they cling like limpets before eventually falling off. And these students started out as the academic cream of the nation. Research at one American university found that those who finish are no cleverer than those who do not. Poor supervision, bad job prospects or lack of money cause them to run out of steam.

http://www.economist.com/node/17723223Now don't get me wrong, I am all for higher education. I love learning, but I don't think the OP would make a wise move going to graduate school in the USA.
 
  • #20
Brian T said:
Would you not want to do some coursework...? o_O
You can take courses in Germany (whatever the university has, not limited to physics), but you don't have to. I don't know where the CMS group in Karlsruhe is - if they are in "Campus Nord" (my guess), that is a bit away from Karlsruhe and its university.
Dhanush Hanga; said:
I do not speak German, but that didn't seem like a problem when I was pursuing my internship.
Expect some German paperwork if you want to live in Germany for a few years, but that's not a real problem.
 
  • #21
HuskyNamedNala said:
but if you can't afford food you what's the point?

Good heavens. More exaggeration. If you google " " the first one that comes up is Cornell, with a minimum 12-month stipend of $29,210. Nobody is starving on that - or even going on food stamps. Is it lavish? No. But "can't afford food" is just making stuff up.
 
  • #22
Vanadium, you don't act much like a moderator for someone who is supposed to be in a position of authority on this site.
 
  • #23
Closed for moderation. EDIT: this will remain closed. The OP has been answered and now we are just degenerating into a likely flame war.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
927
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K