Graduate How Can I Address the Divergence in $\phi$ and $\ket{\overrightarrow{P}}$?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Diracobama2181
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum field theory
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the divergence of the quantity $\phi$ in relation to $\ket{\overrightarrow{P}}$. It is established that the integral diverges as $k$ approaches infinity, primarily due to the behavior of the integrand. Specifically, while the denominator $\omega_k$ increases proportionally to $k$, the overall expression tends toward zero, leading to divergence. Participants are seeking resources to further understand this divergence and its implications. The conversation emphasizes the need for a deeper analysis of the integrand's behavior at infinity.
Diracobama2181
Messages
70
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
Currently needing insight on re normalization for $$\bra{ \overrightarrow{P'}}\phi^4\ket{ \overrightarrow{P}}$$.
I already know this quantity diverges, however I was wondering where to go from there. Any resource would be appreciated. Thank you.
Useful Information:
$$\phi=\int\frac{d^3k}{2\omega_k (2\pi)^3}(\hat{a}(\overrightarrow{k})e^{-ikx}+\hat{a}(\overrightarrow{k})^{\dagger}e^{ikx}))$$
$$\ket{\overrightarrow{P}}=\hat{a}(\overrightarrow{k})^{\dagger}\ket{0}$$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
$$\bra{\overrightarrow{P}}\phi\ket{0}=\frac{1}{2\omega_k (2\pi)^3}(\hat{a}(\overrightarrow{k})e^{-ikx}+\hat{a}(\overrightarrow{k})^{\dagger}e^{ikx})$$To show that this quantity diverges, you will need to analyze the behavior of the integrand as $k \rightarrow \infty$. To do this, consider the limit of the integrand as $k \rightarrow \infty$:$$\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty}\frac{1}{2\omega_k (2\pi)^3}(\hat{a}(\overrightarrow{k})e^{-ikx}+\hat{a}(\overrightarrow{k})^{\dagger}e^{ikx})$$Since $\omega_k \propto k$, the denominator goes to infinity faster than the numerator as $k \rightarrow \infty$, so the integrand goes to 0. Therefore, the integral diverges as $k \rightarrow \infty$.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K