Philosophical question about the integral expression

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the philosophical understanding of integrals, specifically how an integral can represent the area under a curve despite involving an infinite number of calculations related to infinitesimally small rectangles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the concept of taking limits as dx approaches zero and question the implications of this process on the necessity of calculating an infinite number of areas. There is also a comparison made to summing an infinite series.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing insights about the nature of limits and the concept of performing infinite calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between limits and the computation of areas, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the simplicity of the explanation and reflect on prior experiences with similar homework assignments, indicating a potential gap in understanding foundational concepts.

Jacobim
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
How is it possible...that the integral performs an infinite amount of calculations to give the area under a curve.

The integral expression has to find an infinite amount of areas of the (dx by f(x)) rectangles.

I'm guessing there is a simple answer to this, I'm just not quite piecing it together.

I have probably done several homework assignments covering exactly what I'm asking, but I do not know how to answer this question to myself.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
"We take the limit as dx approaches zero"

So this limit means there is no need to calculate the area of the infinite amount of rectangles. Is that it? I was hoping for something more exciting!
 
Well, its a little more complicated that just "dx approaches 0" because the number of terms is increasing at the same time, but yes, we do NOT actually calculate and infinite number of things.
 
It's like asking how you can sum an infinite series a + ar + ar2 + ar3 + ... where |r|< 1 to get exactly a/(1-r) without needing an infinite number of calculations.
 
Jacobim said:
"We take the limit as dx approaches zero"

So this limit means there is no need to calculate the area of the infinite amount of rectangles. Is that it? I was hoping for something more exciting!

No, you have it. If you can compute limits without summing an infinite number of things then you can get the answer without doing an infinite amount of work. It's like Zeno's argument that Achilles can't overtake the tortoise. But only vaguely.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K