Photoelectric Effect: Troubleshooting Experiment Results

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on troubleshooting experimental results related to the photoelectric effect, specifically concerning the steep slope of the current-voltage graph prior to reaching saturation voltage. The experiment involves a zinc cathode within a copper tube under vacuum, illuminated by UV light from a mercury vapor lamp. Key issues raised include potential grounding problems and the influence of vacuum integrity, geometry of the cathode and anode, and possible conductive paths affecting current measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the photoelectric effect and its principles
  • Familiarity with vacuum systems and their maintenance
  • Knowledge of electrical circuit behavior, particularly ohmic behavior
  • Experience with experimental setups involving cathodes and anodes
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate grounding techniques for vacuum tube experiments
  • Learn about vacuum integrity testing methods
  • Research the effects of cathode and anode geometry on current measurements
  • Explore troubleshooting methods for conductive paths in vacuum systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, experimental researchers, and students conducting experiments on the photoelectric effect or working with vacuum systems will benefit from this discussion.

venomxx
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

Im having a problem with the results I am getting for an experiment I am doing in relation to the photoelectric effect. My graph is very similar to that in the attachment, except for the fact that the line at A and again after the drop is sloping at a very steep angle to begin with.

To me this means that the current is varying with the portential before the saturation voltage is reached...does this make any sense? Should i be grounding something other then the obvious maby?

My setup is a zinc cathode within a copper tube under vacume. I am directing uv light from a mercury vaper lamp through a quartz window at the cathode.

Any thoughts would be some help, I am getting the correct work functions but I am curious to know why its different?

Cheers
 

Attachments

  • photef1.gif
    photef1.gif
    3.3 KB · Views: 597
Physics news on Phys.org
As with many experimental issues, such a short description of methods and procedures will not be very useful to determine the exact cause. For instance, what is a copper tube exactly, and how is it oriented relative the zinc cathode, and what is the geometry of the cathode and anode, what is their spacing, etc. It will be very difficult to say without some real information!

Nevertheless, if it is linear it is consistent with ohmic behavior. If there is a leak in the vacuum tube or the gas is ionized, or if there is a buildup of material on the cathode/anode gap etc to provide a conductive path in addition to the photocurrent then you may see a sum of the two currents which would give something like the result you are getting. However, this may not be consistent with the voltages you are applying, again information would help. Good luck!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K