Photon conservation in Raman amplification

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on the conservation of photons in the Raman amplification process, specifically demonstrating that for every photon created at the Stokes frequency (ω_s), one photon in the laser pump field (ω_L) is destroyed. The participants utilize coupled-wave equations to establish that the sum of intensities remains constant, indicating that the sum of the derivatives equals zero. Key equations include the intensity equations and the definitions of α_s and α_L, which are dependent on the nonlinear susceptibility χ_R and the respective frequencies and refractive indices.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of coupled-wave equations in nonlinear optics
  • Familiarity with Raman amplification principles
  • Knowledge of nonlinear susceptibility (χ_R) and its role in light-matter interactions
  • Basic proficiency in calculus, particularly in relation to derivatives and integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the Manley-Rowe relations in nonlinear optics
  • Explore the mathematical modeling of Raman amplification using coupled-wave equations
  • Investigate the role of nonlinear susceptibility (χ_R) in various optical materials
  • Learn about the practical applications of Raman amplification in telecommunications and laser technology
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and engineers working in the fields of nonlinear optics, photonics, and laser technology, particularly those focused on Raman amplification and its applications.

snickersnee
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Part 1:

Homework Statement



Use two coupled-wave equations for the
Raman amplification process depicted to the right
to show that for every photon at Stokes frequency
omega_s created (destroyed) one photon in the laser
pump field omega_L is destroyed (created).

I have the coupled-wave equations, they're given in part 3. Basically, I have to show that the sum of intensities is constant, which means the sum of the derivatives is 0.

Homework Equations



See (3) below

The Attempt at a Solution



\text{For Manley-Rowe, must prove that sum of intensities is constant.}\\<br /> \text{That is, sum of derivatives is 0.}\\<br /> I=2 n_i \epsilon_0 c A_i A^*_i,\ \frac{dI_i}{dz}=2n_i \epsilon_0 c \left( A_i^* \frac{dA_i}{dz}+A_i \frac{dA^*_i}{dz} \right )\\<br /> \text{We have: }\left\{\begin{matrix}<br /> \frac{dA_s}{dz}=\alpha_s A_s,\ where\ \alpha_s=3i\frac{w_s^2}{n_s c}\chi_R^{(3)}(w_s)|A_L|^2\\ <br /> \frac{dA_L}{dz}=\alpha_L A_L,\ where\ \alpha_L=3i\frac{w_L^2}{n_L c}\chi_R^{(3)}(w_L)|A_s|^2\\<br /> \chi_R(w_L)=\chi^*_R(w_s)<br /> \end{matrix}\right.\\ \\<br /> \frac{dI_s}{dz}+\frac{dI_L}{dz}=2n_i \epsilon_0 c \left( \left[ 3i\frac{w_s^2}{n_s c}|A_L|^2 |A_s|^2 \right ]2\chi_R(w_s)+\left[ 3i\frac{w_L^2}{n_L c}|A_L|^2 |A_s|^2 \right ]2\chi_R(w_L)\right )\\<br />

The sum of derivatives is supposed to be 0, but I don't see how. Adding chi_R to its complex conjugate gives a real number that isn't 0:

<br /> \epsilon_0 \left( \frac{N}{6m} \right)\left( \frac{\partial a}{\partial q} \right)^2_0 \left[ \frac{1}{w_v^2-(w_s-w_L)^2 +2i(w_s-w_L)\gamma}+ \frac{1}{w_v^2-(w_L-w_s)^2 +2i(w_L-w_s)\gamma} \right ]\\<br /> =\frac{(w_s+w_L^2-2w_sw_L)-2i(w_s-w_L)\gamma+(w_s+w_L^2-2w_sw_L)+2i(w_s-w_L)\gamma}{(w_s+w_L^2-2w_sw_L)^2+4(w_s-w_L)^2 \gamma^2}\\=\frac{2}{[(w_s+w_L^2-2w_sw_L)+4\gamma^2]}<br />

Part 2:

Homework Statement


In part 2, values are given for chi_R(w_s), Stokes and laser frequencies, refractive indices, and intensities for both the laser wave and Stokes wave at z=0. I need to find the intensity of the laser wave at z=1 cm (that is, after propagating 1 cm in the Raman medium.

Homework Equations


Same as Part 1

The Attempt at a Solution



I think we can just plug into the intensity equation, where dz is 1 cm. It seems to me that we need numbers for amplitude values, but they aren't given.
Thanks for reading all that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\text{For Manley-Rowe, must prove that sum of intensities is constant.}\\\text{That is, sum of derivatives is 0.}\\I=2 n_i \epsilon_0 c A_i A^*_i,\ \frac{dI_i}{dz}=2n_i \epsilon_0 c \left( A_i^* \frac{dA_i}{dz}+A_i \frac{dA^*_i}{dz} \right )\\\text{We have: }\left\{\begin{matrix}\frac{dA_s}{dz}=\alpha_s A_s,\ where\ \alpha_s=3i\frac{w_s^2}{n_s c}\chi_R^{(3)}(w_s)|A_L|^2\\ \frac{dA_L}{dz}=\alpha_L A_L,\ where\ \alpha_L=3i\frac{w_L^2}{n_L c}\chi_R^{(3)}(w_L)|A_s|^2\\\chi_R(w_L)=\chi^*_R(w_s)\end{matrix}\right.\\ \\\frac{dI_s}{dz}+\frac{dI_L}{dz}=2n_i \epsilon_0 c \left( \left[ 3i\frac{w_s^2}{n_s c}|A_L|^2 |A_s|^2 \right ]2\chi_R(w_s)+\left[ 3i\frac{w_L^2}{n_L c}|A_L|^2 |A_s|^2 \right ]2\chi_R(w_L)\right )\\=0\\\therefore\ I_s(z=1cm)+I_L(z=1cm)=I_s(z=0)+I_L(z=0)=constant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
6K