Maxwell's Derivation of EM Wave Momentum: E/c

In summary, the momentum of an electromagnetic wave, derived by Maxwell or not, can be expressed as E/c. This is supported by the Special Theory of Relativity, which states that the energy of a particle is equal to its momentum times the speed of light. Quantum mechanics also supports this result, with the energy of a photon being equal to its frequency times Planck's constant and its momentum being equal to its wavenumber times Planck's constant divided by 2π. It can be shown that the relationship between frequency and wavenumber is ω = kc, resulting in the same expression for the momentum of an electromagnetic wave.
  • #1
vin300
603
4
How did maxwell derive the momentum of electromagnetic wave to be E/c ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I don't know how Maxwell derived it, or even whether he derived it. But there are two things I can say about where the result comes from.

First, you can show as a result of the Special Theory of Relativity that the general expression for the energy, E, of a particle is given by:

E2 = p2c2 + m2c4

where p is the momentum of the particle, m is its mass, and c is the speed of light. So, for a massless (m = 0) particle like a photon, this reduces to

E = pc​

Second, this result is not inconsistent with the results of quantum mechanics. For example, quantum mechanics says that for particle states in which there is a definite momentum, that momentum is given by

[tex] p = \hbar k [/tex]​

where [itex] \hbar [/itex] is h/2π, h is Planck's constant, and k = 2π/λ is the wavenumber of the particle. However, you may also be familiar with the result from quantum mechanics that the photon energy is given by:

E = hν​

where ν is the frequency of the photon. Now, remember that the relationship between frequency and angular frequency (ω) is ν = ω/2π. So we can write the photon energy as:

E = (hω)/2π = [itex] \hbar \omega [/itex]​

I apologize for the hybrid between LaTeX and non-LaTeX equations. I couldn't be sure that hbar character would show up for all users, so I resorted to LaTeX to generate it. Anyway, so we have the results that:
[itex] p = \hbar k [/itex] and [itex]E = \hbar \omega [/itex]. How are ω and k related? Well, recall that the speed of a wave is the product of its wavelength and its frequency:

c = λν = (λω)/2π = ω/k​

Therefore:
ω = kc​

and:

[itex]E = \hbar \omega [/itex] = [itex] \hbar kc [/itex] = pc​

Same result.
 

1. What is Maxwell's derivation of EM wave momentum?

Maxwell's derivation of EM wave momentum is a mathematical explanation for how electromagnetic waves carry momentum. This was first proposed by James Clerk Maxwell in his famous set of equations, known as Maxwell's equations.

2. How does Maxwell's derivation relate to the speed of light?

In Maxwell's derivation, the momentum of an electromagnetic wave is directly proportional to its energy and inversely proportional to the speed of light. This means that as the speed of light increases, the momentum of the wave also increases.

3. Can you explain the formula E/c in Maxwell's derivation?

The formula E/c represents the ratio of the energy of an electromagnetic wave to the speed of light. This ratio is used to calculate the momentum of the wave, as the momentum is equal to the energy divided by the speed of light.

4. What evidence supports Maxwell's derivation of EM wave momentum?

Maxwell's derivation is supported by various experiments and observations, such as the deflection of light by a magnetic field and the movement of charged particles in an electric field. These phenomena can only be explained by considering the momentum of electromagnetic waves.

5. How does Maxwell's derivation impact our understanding of EM waves?

Maxwell's derivation has greatly enhanced our understanding of electromagnetic waves and their behavior. It has helped us to understand how these waves interact with matter and how they can be used in various technologies, such as radio communication and medical imaging.

Similar threads

  • Classical Physics
2
Replies
65
Views
3K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
3
Views
477
  • Classical Physics
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
320
  • Classical Physics
Replies
16
Views
642
  • Classical Physics
Replies
2
Views
176
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
10
Views
874
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
34
Views
2K
Back
Top