Photon-Photon Coupling (Gamma-Gamma)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sanman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coupling
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

At sufficiently high energies, photons can interact with each other, primarily through the temporary creation of electron-positron pairs, which allows for photon-photon coupling. This interaction becomes significant only at high energy levels, where the amplitude for pair creation is sufficient. Constructive and destructive interference remains a fundamental aspect of quantum amplitudes, regardless of the energy involved. The electromagnetic interaction governs these photon interactions, distinct from the strong interaction seen in hadron collisions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)
  • Photon interactions and pair production
  • Fundamentals of quantum amplitudes
  • Electromagnetic field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the conditions for photon-photon interactions in Quantum Electrodynamics (QED).
  • Study the process of electron-positron pair production in high-energy physics.
  • Explore the implications of quantum amplitudes on interference patterns.
  • Investigate the differences between electromagnetic and strong interactions in particle physics.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in high-energy physics, and students studying quantum mechanics will benefit from this discussion on photon-photon coupling and its underlying principles.

sanman
Messages
737
Reaction score
24
So I've read that at sufficiently high energies, photons will interact with each other rather than passing through each other in the usual ghostly ways.

So in these situations, is constructive/destructive interference still possible? What is the threshold where it might stop, for practical purposes? (ie. what frequency or photonic energy level?)

Is there some energy where 2 photons would collide like hadrons would?

Is this type of coupling purely due to EM potential, or is there anything analogous to Pauli Exclusion Principle that could happen?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sanman said:
I've read

Can you give a specific reference? That always helps.

sanman said:
at sufficiently high energies, photons will interact with each other rather than passing through each other in the usual ghostly ways

More precisely, there is an amplitude for photons to interact with each other, but it's way too small to observe at everyday energies and only becomes significant at high energies. One way to think about what is going on is to think of the interaction as involving the temporary creation of an electron-positron pair: a pair of incoming photons turns into an electron-positron pair, then the pair annihilates and creates a pair of outgoing photons. To us this looks like two photons interacting with each other (because we don't observe the temporary electron-positron pair), but of course there has to be enough energy to create the electron-positron pair (more precisely, to have a significant amplitude for pair creation) for the interaction to be significant.

sanman said:
in these situations, is constructive/destructive interference still possible?

It's always possible; it's a fundamental feature of quantum amplitudes.

sanman said:
Is there some energy where 2 photons would collide like hadrons would?

I don't understand what you mean. The interaction involved is the electromagnetic interaction, not the strong interaction.

sanman said:
Is this type of coupling purely due to EM potential

I'm not sure what you mean here either. It's the quantum electromagnetic field.

sanman said:
is there anything analogous to Pauli Exclusion Principle that could happen?

No, because there are not multiple fermions of the same type present.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K