Photon pressure from energy density

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Photon gas pressure is defined as the photon energy density per volume divided by three, due to the relationship between a photon's energy and momentum, with the division accounting for the three spatial dimensions. At high temperatures, the presence of virtual particles alongside photons leads to the formation of electron/positron pairs, complicating the energy density dynamics. As temperature increases, the energy required to raise the temperature further also increases, similar to the boiling point of water. Beyond certain high temperatures, current physics fails to provide a clear understanding of the behavior of photon gases.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of photon energy and momentum relationships
  • Familiarity with classical electromagnetism principles
  • Knowledge of thermodynamics and temperature effects on particle behavior
  • Basic concepts of particle physics, including electron/positron pair production
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of photon gas pressure in statistical mechanics
  • Explore the implications of high-energy density in astrophysics
  • Study the behavior of virtual particles in quantum field theory
  • Investigate the conditions leading to black hole formation from energy density
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astrophysicists, and students studying thermodynamics and particle physics, particularly those interested in the behavior of photon gases and high-energy density phenomena.

emz
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Why is photon gas pressure = photon energy density (per volume) divided by 3?
Thank you
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
emz said:
Why is photon gas pressure = photon energy density (per volume) divided by 3?
Thank you
Basically it's down to a photon's energy being equal to its momentum, and the division by three comes from the three dimensions of space (energy is a scalar, independent of direction, but momentum has direction, and pressure is the average momentum of particles traveling in a given direction).
 
Not to hijack the thread, but is there a physical limit to how high electromagnetic energy density can go, like a certain point where you can't pack anymore photons in a given volume at all? I imagine now there would come a point where a black hole would form, but in the beginning, it seems like you could have just about any amount of photons in a cerain space.
 
easyrider said:
Not to hijack the thread, but is there a physical limit to how high electromagnetic energy density can go, like a certain point where you can't pack anymore photons in a given volume at all? I imagine now there would come a point where a black hole would form, but in the beginning, it seems like you could have just about any amount of photons in a cerain space.
If you just take classical electromagnetism, yes, you can pack as many as you like into whatever volume you like.

In practice, however, the number and frequency of photons you typically get within a region of space-time depends upon the temperature. At very high temperatures, virtual particles start to appear regularly alongside the photons. For example, once a significant number of photons have enough energy to collide and produce electron/positron pairs, you end up with a gas consisting of photons as well as electron/positron pairs. As the temperature increases further, more types of particle/anti-particle pairs are produced. This tends to "spread out" the energy, so that it requires much greater energy to go to higher temperatures. It's sort of like boiling water: the water gets to 100C, and then you have to keep dumping energy into it until it all boils before it will go any higher in temperature.

At some point, you get to high enough temperatures that the physics we know doesn't work any longer. Then, well, we don't know what happens.
 
Thank you Chalnoth.
 
I know this is an old thread but, since I was stuck on the same question and have worked out a derivation, I may as well post it. The derivation for a photon gas (for which the relationship is exact) is in the first part of the post. The second part is trying to derive it as an approximate relationship for a relativistic gas of massive particles such as electrons. I'm not happy with that bit yet, so it's best ignored.

https://www.physicsforums.com/blog.php?b=4635
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K