Photon vs Energy: What's the Difference?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter glueball8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Photons
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Photons are the carrier particles for electromagnetic energy, but they are not energy themselves; rather, they transport energy. Energy is a property of a system, while photons possess additional properties such as momentum and angular momentum. The interaction between photons and electrons, particularly during absorption, involves momentum interchange, as established by Einstein in 1916. This interaction is crucial for understanding phenomena like Compton Scattering and the behavior of atoms in laser cooling techniques.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic theory
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts, particularly photon behavior
  • Knowledge of momentum conservation principles
  • Basic grasp of atomic structure and energy states
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Compton Scattering and its implications in quantum mechanics
  • Study Einstein's 1916 paper on the interaction of matter and radiation
  • Explore laser cooling techniques and their applications in atomic physics
  • Learn about the de Broglie hypothesis and its relevance to photon momentum
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, researchers in quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the fundamental properties of light and its interactions with matter.

glueball8
Messages
345
Reaction score
1
Why can't photons be the same as energy? How are they different?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, BW.
Photons are the bosuns (carrier particles) for electromagnetic energy. While they are not energy themselves, they do transport it from place to place.
That's the best that I can do by way of explanation, given my own limited education, but others will be along shortly who can do a better job of it.
 
Bright Wang said:
Why can't photons be the same as energy? How are they different?
Energy is a property of a particle/system. Saying photons are energy is like saying electrons are charge.
 
Very well put, easily understood descriptions!

I love it when longwinded dogma is avoided on subjects like this.

(to help prevent 'longwinded' responses to my response, I replaced "definitions" with descriptions. lol)
 
Another good way to put it would be to say that photons have properties other than their energy. In fact, photons also carry momentum and angular momentum.
 
Is it possible to have a photon with no energy left to tranfer?
Would it behave differently?
 
If photons have momentum, when an electron captures a photon, does it make any difference in the electrons energy or path after capture depending on the direction the photon was traveling before it was captured by the electron?
 
Jeff Reid said:
If photons have momentum, when an electron captures a photon, does it make any difference in the electrons energy or path after capture depending on the direction the photon was traveling before it was captured by the electron?

A man called Heisenberg asked that around a century earlier. He was never certain as to what would happen :rolleyes:.
 
Jeff Reid said:
If photons have momentum, when an electron captures a photon, does it make any difference in the electrons energy or path after capture depending on the direction the photon was traveling before it was captured by the electron?

dst said:
A man called Heisenberg asked that around a century earlier. He was never certain as to what would happen.

If it's unknown, then why do so many people state that photons have momentum? Is there any other way that photons could exhibit momentum properties?
 
  • #10
Jeff Reid said:
If it's unknown, then why do so many people state that photons have momentum? Is there any other way that photons could exhibit momentum properties?
In the analysis of Compton Scattering, the photon is assumed to be a particle that has a momentum determined by the de Broglie hypothesis.
 
  • #11
Jeff Reid said:
If photons have momentum, when an electron captures a photon, does it make any difference in the electrons energy or path after capture depending on the direction the photon was traveling before it was captured by the electron?
Yes. Energy and momentum are conserved.
 
  • #12
When an atom absorbs or emits a photon, momentum is interchanged. This was first explicitly shown by Einstein in a 1916 paper.

He shows that when matter and radiation interact, the momentum interchange is necessary to get the Planck radiation curve.
 
  • #13
OK, but don't electrons have discreet energy states? So if an electron captures a photo, and jumps up to the next energy state, regardless of the direction of the photon, where does the momentum change due to the direction of the photon go?

On a related issue, what determines if a photon will be captured and released as if reflected (mirror mode) as opposed to released with the same phase and direction (laser mode)?
 
  • #14
Electrons only have discrete energy states when they are in atomic orbitals. In that case the momentum "goes" into the whole atom.
 
  • #15
It is as DaleSpam says. This is the process by which atoms can be cooled by a carefully tuned laser 'molasses' beam.

The beam is tuned to just below the frequency of an absorption line, so only atoms moving towards the source of the beam will absorb, and therefore slow down. The re-emisson of the photon is random, and the overall effect is to slow down the atoms.
 
  • #16
dst said:
A man called Heisenberg asked that around a century earlier. He was never certain as to what would happen :rolleyes:.

Ha ha! kudos on this one dst :cool:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K