Photon vs Energy: What's the Difference?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter glueball8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Photons
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the relationship between photons and energy, exploring how photons function as carriers of electromagnetic energy and their distinct properties. Participants delve into concepts such as momentum, energy states of electrons, and the implications of photon interactions with matter, including absorption and emission processes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that photons are not energy themselves but rather transport energy, likening the relationship to that of electrons and charge.
  • Others argue that photons possess properties beyond energy, including momentum and angular momentum.
  • A question is raised about the possibility of a photon having no energy and how that would affect its behavior.
  • Participants inquire whether the direction of a photon's momentum affects the energy or path of an electron upon capture.
  • Some contributions reference historical uncertainty regarding photon momentum, citing Heisenberg's inquiries into the topic.
  • One participant mentions that in Compton Scattering, photons are treated as particles with momentum defined by the de Broglie hypothesis.
  • Another point discusses the conservation of energy and momentum when an atom absorbs or emits a photon, referencing Einstein's work on momentum interchange.
  • Questions arise regarding the discrete energy states of electrons and how momentum changes during photon capture are accounted for.
  • Some participants discuss the concept of laser cooling and how photon absorption is influenced by the direction of the beam relative to atomic motion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the nature of photons and their relationship to energy and momentum. The discussion remains unresolved, with various hypotheses and questions posed without consensus.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of energy and momentum, as well as unresolved questions about the behavior of photons in different contexts, such as absorption and emission processes.

glueball8
Messages
345
Reaction score
1
Why can't photons be the same as energy? How are they different?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, BW.
Photons are the bosuns (carrier particles) for electromagnetic energy. While they are not energy themselves, they do transport it from place to place.
That's the best that I can do by way of explanation, given my own limited education, but others will be along shortly who can do a better job of it.
 
Bright Wang said:
Why can't photons be the same as energy? How are they different?
Energy is a property of a particle/system. Saying photons are energy is like saying electrons are charge.
 
Very well put, easily understood descriptions!

I love it when longwinded dogma is avoided on subjects like this.

(to help prevent 'longwinded' responses to my response, I replaced "definitions" with descriptions. lol)
 
Another good way to put it would be to say that photons have properties other than their energy. In fact, photons also carry momentum and angular momentum.
 
Is it possible to have a photon with no energy left to tranfer?
Would it behave differently?
 
If photons have momentum, when an electron captures a photon, does it make any difference in the electrons energy or path after capture depending on the direction the photon was traveling before it was captured by the electron?
 
Jeff Reid said:
If photons have momentum, when an electron captures a photon, does it make any difference in the electrons energy or path after capture depending on the direction the photon was traveling before it was captured by the electron?

A man called Heisenberg asked that around a century earlier. He was never certain as to what would happen :rolleyes:.
 
Jeff Reid said:
If photons have momentum, when an electron captures a photon, does it make any difference in the electrons energy or path after capture depending on the direction the photon was traveling before it was captured by the electron?

dst said:
A man called Heisenberg asked that around a century earlier. He was never certain as to what would happen.

If it's unknown, then why do so many people state that photons have momentum? Is there any other way that photons could exhibit momentum properties?
 
  • #10
Jeff Reid said:
If it's unknown, then why do so many people state that photons have momentum? Is there any other way that photons could exhibit momentum properties?
In the analysis of Compton Scattering, the photon is assumed to be a particle that has a momentum determined by the de Broglie hypothesis.
 
  • #11
Jeff Reid said:
If photons have momentum, when an electron captures a photon, does it make any difference in the electrons energy or path after capture depending on the direction the photon was traveling before it was captured by the electron?
Yes. Energy and momentum are conserved.
 
  • #12
When an atom absorbs or emits a photon, momentum is interchanged. This was first explicitly shown by Einstein in a 1916 paper.

He shows that when matter and radiation interact, the momentum interchange is necessary to get the Planck radiation curve.
 
  • #13
OK, but don't electrons have discreet energy states? So if an electron captures a photo, and jumps up to the next energy state, regardless of the direction of the photon, where does the momentum change due to the direction of the photon go?

On a related issue, what determines if a photon will be captured and released as if reflected (mirror mode) as opposed to released with the same phase and direction (laser mode)?
 
  • #14
Electrons only have discrete energy states when they are in atomic orbitals. In that case the momentum "goes" into the whole atom.
 
  • #15
It is as DaleSpam says. This is the process by which atoms can be cooled by a carefully tuned laser 'molasses' beam.

The beam is tuned to just below the frequency of an absorption line, so only atoms moving towards the source of the beam will absorb, and therefore slow down. The re-emisson of the photon is random, and the overall effect is to slow down the atoms.
 
  • #16
dst said:
A man called Heisenberg asked that around a century earlier. He was never certain as to what would happen :rolleyes:.

Ha ha! kudos on this one dst :cool:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K