Physically plausible explanation for missile based space combat?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the effectiveness of missile and laser technologies in space combat, analyzing their strengths and weaknesses from a physics and engineering perspective. It highlights that while lasers can engage targets from a distance, the energy required to destroy a missile may be less than that needed to launch a long-range missile. Key points include the cooling limitations of laser systems, the fragility of focusing mirrors, and the potential for jamming defenses. Missiles are noted for their ability to carry long-range warheads and maneuver, making them difficult targets for lasers, especially when launched stealthily. The conversation also touches on the challenges of missile propulsion, detection, and the implications of high-velocity impacts in space. Additionally, the potential for nuclear weapons in space warfare is discussed, emphasizing the risks and strategic considerations involved. Overall, the thread suggests that future space combat may resemble submarine warfare, with stealth and indirect attacks playing crucial roles.
  • #101
Remember that in the real asteroid belt the rocks are space widely apart. I was told that on average you can't see one from the other with a Mk. 1, Mod. 0 eyeball.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #102
Noisy Rhysling said:
Remember that in the real asteroid belt the rocks are space widely apart. I was told that on average you can't see one from the other with a Mk. 1, Mod. 0 eyeball.
i know but if the target is something ön or around an asteroid they still offer cover.
 
  • #103
GTOM said:
i know but if the target is something ön or around an asteroid they still offer cover.
Yep, but in general you couldn't count on them for cover even inside the Belt.

That could be a "teaching moment" for the mids.

"Okay, you lot, calculate the most effective coverage of Ceres with our missiles. Explain your choice." Something along those lines.
 

Similar threads

Replies
44
Views
8K
Replies
60
Views
6K
Replies
18
Views
5K
Replies
22
Views
4K
2
Replies
96
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top