Exploring Hard SF Tactics in Space Combat

  • Thread starter Thread starter GTOM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard Sf Space
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the tactics and technologies that could be employed in hard science fiction (SF) scenarios for space combat, particularly focusing on the capture of planetary bodies like Mars. Participants examine the effectiveness of various weapon systems, orbital dynamics, and troop deployment strategies in a theoretical military context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that big surface lasers could outpower ships but question their effectiveness against surface units, suggesting factors like the curvature of the planet and potential cooling methods for land units.
  • There is speculation about the size and capabilities of mass drivers needed to launch projectiles from Mars, with references to existing technologies like railguns.
  • Participants discuss the dynamics of landing troops safely on Mars, considering the use of motherships in high orbit and the velocity of drop pods upon descent.
  • Some argue that even with advanced weaponry, ground troops remain essential for capturing and holding strategic locations, as they can take over structures without destruction.
  • There are differing views on the feasibility of using ice as a coolant for weapons systems, with some questioning its practicality and effectiveness.
  • The potential for special forces to disrupt enemy defenses prior to a main attack is debated, with varying opinions on the challenges of landing troops undetected.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the effectiveness of various tactics and technologies in space combat, with no consensus reached on the best approaches or the role of ground troops versus orbital bombardment.

Contextual Notes

Discussions include unresolved assumptions about the effectiveness of different weapon systems, the practicality of proposed tactics, and the limitations of current technologies in a theoretical context.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in speculative military tactics, hard science fiction, and the implications of technology in space exploration and combat scenarios may find this discussion relevant.

  • #61
GTOM said:
You said that i shouldn't view EMP as anti-electronic placenta.

I think you mean panacea. :wink:

GTOM said:
But is there any way of more effective electronic countermeasure, that requires only minor magitech?

Sure, there are innumerable solutions that require only a little bit of "handwaving". Just be creative.

GTOM said:
I read somewhere that cosmic rays can affect electronics, turn over a single bit could crash a program. While there are countermeasures for it, but if multiple Cpus programs have to check each other, than robots would be hindered.

Maybe not if they're designed to operate with these CPU's and check-programs running. Or if they have redundant systems and can't be taken out because a single bit was flipped on one of their systems.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: GTOM

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 90 ·
4
Replies
90
Views
8K
Replies
102
Views
15K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K