Physics Graph question -- Pushing a block on a frictionless surface

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the work done on a 7.20 kg block moving on a frictionless surface due to a varying force along the x-axis. The total work done as the block moves from the origin to 8.0 m is determined to be 33 J by calculating the area under the force vs. position graph in segments. For part B, the user seeks clarification on how to find the block's velocity at 8.0 m using the work-energy theorem. The work-energy theorem relates the work done on an object to its change in kinetic energy, suggesting that the user's understanding of this concept is crucial for solving the problem. The conversation emphasizes the importance of mastering work-energy relationships in physics.
Bdb1331
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The diagram shows how a force along the x-axis varies with location. A block of mass 7.20 kg moves along the x-axis on a horizontal frictionless surface, influenced by this force. (Graph is attached)
A) How much work is done by the force as the block moves from the origin to 8.0 m?

B) If the block has a velocity of 3.80 m/s at the origin, what is its velocity at 8.0 m?

For part A, I worked out the work to be 33 J by finding the area under the curve...
in the first two seconds

W = F(avg)d
W = [(2 + 8) / 2](2 - 0)
W = 10 J

from 2 to 4 seconds

W = [(8 + 4)/2] (4 - 2)
W = 12 J

from 4 to 6 s

W = 4(6 - 4)
W = 8 J

from 6 to 8 s

W = [(4 + -1)/2](8 - 6)
W = 3 J

Total work

W = 10 + 12 + 8 + 3
W = 33 J

But I am sort of lost when it comes to B)
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-10-27 at 12.55.37 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-10-27 at 12.55.37 PM.png
    7.8 KB · Views: 525
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you familiar with work-energy relationships?
 
PhanthomJay said:
Are you familiar with work-energy relationships?
Sorta, but not exactly confident in my skills
 
Bdb1331 said:
Sorta, but not exactly confident in my skills
Well, just try using the work - energy theorem. What does that theorem say?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top