Physics Practical: Check proportionality

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on how to demonstrate the inverse proportionality between two variables in a physics practical. The mark scheme mentions a 20% margin for calculations, which raises questions about its significance, as the calculated percentage difference of k is only 0.2%. Participants express concerns about the validity of drawing conclusions from just two measurements and the appropriateness of the problem setup. Additionally, there is a suggestion to explore a hypothetical scenario involving tilting a bottle, prompting further questions about the relationship between height and angle. The conversation highlights the complexities of interpreting experimental results and the importance of adequate data for analysis.
Janiceleong26
Messages
276
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


image.jpg
image.jpg
image.jpg


For part d), how to show that they are inversely proportional to each other ? The mark scheme states:

"Correct calculation to check inverse proportionality. √h x cosϑ = k. Sensible comments relating to calculations to within 20% or their own value and suggested relation."

What do they mean by 20%?

Homework Equations


Percentage uncertainty = (uncertainty/measured value) x100%

The Attempt at a Solution


My values are,

√h = (2.95±0.1) cm, cos θ = 0.50. k1 = 2.95 x 0.50 = 1.475
√h = (2.30±0.1) cm, cos θ = 0.64, k2 = 2.30 x 0.64 = 1.472

I calculated the percentage difference of k,
((1.475-1.472) /1.472 ) x 100% = 0.2%

Then I calculated the uncertainty of √h = (0.1 / 2.30) x 100% = 4.3%

This is the method I followed from a textbook, so what does the 20% in the mark scheme represents ? Hope you all understand what I'm doing here..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The square root of a height should not have centimeters as units.

A 20% uncertainty which the quoted text might suggest would be very large.

I don't like the way the problem is set up. With just those two measurements, it is not reasonable to draw any conclusions about the relation between h and θ.

Fun exercise: calculate the height h which allows tilting the bottle by 90 degrees without tipping over. Is this realistic?
 
mfb said:
The square root of a height should not have centimeters as units.

A 20% uncertainty which the quoted text might suggest would be very large.

I don't like the way the problem is set up. With just those two measurements, it is not reasonable to draw any conclusions about the relation between h and θ.

Fun exercise: calculate the height h which allows tilting the bottle by 90 degrees without tipping over. Is this realistic?

Oh yeah, was not aware, sorry.

Hmm.. what do you mean tilting the bottle by 90 degrees?
 
Which height h corresponds to θ=0? Is that realistic?
What happens if you reduce h a bit more?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
24K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 175 ·
6
Replies
175
Views
26K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
13K