Physics Superposition and Standing Waves (ch. 18)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving standing waves on a string, where a 6.70 kg object is suspended from a string with specific parameters. Participants are tasked with determining the frequency required for the string to vibrate in a standing wave pattern, given the tension and other relevant values.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants share their calculations for frequency based on the tension and the harmonic number (n). There is discussion about the correct value of n and how it relates to the physical setup of the problem. Some participants question the assumptions regarding the length of the string used in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly regarding the value of n and the effective length of the string for the standing wave. Some participants have provided calculations that yield similar results, while others are clarifying their approaches and assumptions.

Contextual Notes

There is some confusion regarding the length of the string to be used in calculations, with participants debating whether to use the full length or just the segment over which the wave is present. The tension value is also a point of verification among participants.

Keithkent09
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 6.70 kg object hangs in equilibrium from a string with a total length of L = 5.30 m and a linear mass density of µ = 0.00100 kg/m. The string is wrapped around two light frictionless pulleys that are separated by a distance of d = 2.00 m. (visual is attached) The tension is 41.6 N
At what frequency must the string between the pulleys vibrate in order to form the standing wave pattern shown in (b)? (Visual is attached)

Homework Equations


f=(n/2L)*sqrt(T/u)


The Attempt at a Solution


I already figured out the tension so I plugged in the relevant values and what I thought the value for n might be but nothing I tried worked.
 

Attachments

  • p14-59.gif
    p14-59.gif
    2.7 KB · Views: 528
Physics news on Phys.org
I get around 150 Hz, is this what you got?
 
The correct answer is 155 and I got 150 one of the times I worked the problem. What did you use for n?
 
I used n=3 from the photo. I assume your tension computation was correct. You may want to dbl check to see if it is off a bit.
EDIT seems ok, I get 153hz. :devil:
 
Last edited:
Even though the distance over the waves is 2 meters you still set the n to be equal to 3? Are you using the same equation that I used above? The tension is correct that much I do know.
 
Keithkent09 said:
Even though the distance over the waves is 2 meters you still set the n to be equal to 3? Are you using the same equation that I used above? The tension is correct that much I do know.
Yea, I checked it and get 153Hz. N is the wave number right? So that's what I used as it looks like 1.5 lambda stretched across the 2 meters or am I missing something?
 
Yeah I follow that, what did you do with the 1.5 lambda over two meters though. I thought the n=3 was just inserted straight into the equation.
 
Keithkent09 said:
Yeah I follow that, what did you do with the 1.5 lambda over two meters though. I thought the n=3 was just inserted straight into the equation.

Which is what I did, just taking the cue for what harmonic from the pic.
 
The tension should be 41.27397 N. Using that tension, I got 152.36979 Hz as the final answer.

Note that 150 N, 152 N, 153 N, and 155 N are the same if we ignore the least significant digit.

Don't worry about it; you did it right.
 
  • #10
When I plug three in for n i get 57.5.
For me the worked out equation looks like this:
f=(3/2L)*(sqrt(41.3/.001)) with L equaling 5.3. What did you do differently?
When I got 150 earlier I had n equaling a much larger value.
Sorry it is taking me so long to get this.
 
  • #11
Keithkent09 said:
When I plug three in for n i get 57.5.
For me the worked out equation looks like this:
f=(3/2L)*(sqrt(41.3/.001)) with L equaling 5.3. What did you do differently?
When I got 150 earlier I had n equaling a much larger value.
Sorry it is taking me so long to get this.

I took L=2.0m that is the wave is only present in the top segment and stops at the pullies which I took to be points of forced zero amplitude boundary condition.
 
  • #12
Oh, I was using L=5.3 instead of just the distance that really mattered as 2. Thank you very much I got the answer now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K