Physics textbook, replace sine with its definition (?)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of a physics textbook instruction that suggests replacing the sine function with its definition in terms of other variables, specifically in a two-dimensional context involving angles and coordinates. Participants explore the implications of this instruction, focusing on the definitions of sine and cosine in relation to geometric and algebraic contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the meaning of replacing sin(theta) with an expression involving x and y, indicating confusion about the instruction.
  • Another participant suggests that the discussion is likely situated in a two-dimensional plane where trigonometric functions can be expressed in terms of x and y.
  • There is a request for clarification regarding the context of the variables x, y, and theta, indicating that prior information is necessary to understand the instruction fully.
  • Multiple definitions of sine are proposed, including the unit circle definition and series expansions, but the relevance of these definitions to the original question is debated.
  • One participant emphasizes that the geometric definition of sine, related to right triangles, is fundamental and should not be overlooked in the discussion.
  • Another participant reiterates the importance of basic definitions in the context of the discussion, suggesting that more complex definitions may distract from foundational concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying interpretations of the instruction and the definitions of sine, leading to a lack of consensus. Some focus on geometric definitions, while others consider algebraic or series-based definitions, indicating multiple competing views.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion due to missing context from the textbook, which affects the clarity of the instruction. The definitions of sine and cosine are presented in various forms, but their applicability to the original question remains unresolved.

1MileCrash
Messages
1,338
Reaction score
41
physics textbook, replace sine with its definition (?)

What on Earth do they mean?

"That will introduce either sin(theta) or cos(theta). Reduce the resulting two variables, x and theta, to one, x, by replacing the trigonometric function with an expression (its definition) involving x and y."

Replace sin(theta) with a function of x and y? What?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Sounds like this is on a 2d plane, in which case [itex]\theta[/itex] denotes the counterclockwise angle from the x-axis, and any trig function of [itex]\theta[/itex] can be written in terms of x and y.
 


Both? Or one or the other?
 


1MileCrash said:
"That will introduce either sin(theta) or cos(theta). Reduce the resulting two variables, x and theta, to one, x, by replacing the trigonometric function with an expression (its definition) involving x and y."
Unless you tell us the paragraph that came before this, we won't be able to work out what this is all about. What are x, y, and θ?
 


What is the fundamental definition of sin?
 


Ill post the rest when I'm at a computer. Thanks again.
 


Integral said:
What is the fundamental definition of sin?

Well, there are multiple ways to define it. The ones I can think of off the top of my head are:

[tex]\sin'=\cos[/tex]
[tex]\cos'=-\sin[/tex]
[tex]\sin\left(0\right)=0[/tex]

Another is the unit circle definition, another is:

[tex]\sin\left(x\right)=\sum_{i=0}^\infty\left(\dfrac{x^{2\cdot i+1}\cdot\left(-1\right)^i}{\left(2\cdot i+1\right)!}\right)[/tex]
[tex]\cos\left(x\right)=\sum_{i=0}^\infty\left(\dfrac{x^{2\cdot i}\cdot\left(-1\right)^i}{\left(2\cdot i\right)!}\right)[/tex]

(Might have gotten one of those wrong)

And then

[tex]\arcsin\left(x\right)=\int_0^x\left(\dfrac{\mathrm{d}x}{\sqrt{1-x^2}}\right)[/tex]
[tex]\arccos\left(x\right)=\int_x^1\left(\dfrac{\mathrm{d}x}{\sqrt{1-x^2}}\right)[/tex]
(Might have gotten that second one wrong, but I'm pretty confident about it)
 


The formula that is being referred to is [itex]\theta = \arctan \frac{y}{x}[/itex]. Other forms are [itex]\sin(\theta) = \frac{y}{\sqrt{x^2+ y^2}}[/itex] and [itex]\cos(\theta) = \frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+ y^2}}[/itex], which can be derived from the previous. These last two formulas are the definitions the text is referring to.

If you don't understand these formulas and what they're all about, google goniometric circle.
 


What Integral is aiming for is not a derivation for sine that would come from differential calculus or one that would come from a summing of series. He's talking about geometry.

If you have a right triangle, what is the relationship between one of the acute angles and the lengths of the sides?
 
  • #10


jbriggs444 said:
What Integral is aiming for is not a derivation for sine that would come from differential calculus or one that would come from a summing of series. He's talking about geometry.

If you have a right triangle, what is the relationship between one of the acute angles and the lengths of the sides?

Ah. The geometric definition. (And those aren't derivations at all, they can be used as definitions.)
 
  • #11


Whovian said:
Ah. The geometric definition. (And those aren't derivations at all, they can be used as definitions.)

In that whole long post you never once mentioned the most basic and fundamental definition. :confused:

Don't lose track of the basics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K