PIN Photodiode, High Voc, Low Isc

  • Thread starter Thread starter Qianlong
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photodiode Pin
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the performance characteristics of a silicon PIN photodiode in photovoltaic mode, specifically focusing on the measurements of open-circuit voltage and short-circuit current under varying light intensities. Participants explore both experimental observations and theoretical concepts related to the behavior of the photodiode.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes conducting measurements of open-circuit voltage and short-circuit current, noting the claimed maximum operating current and active area of the photodiode.
  • It is proposed that the short-circuit current should increase linearly with optical power, while the open-circuit voltage is expected to increase logarithmically, with a linear approximation for low optical powers.
  • Open-circuit voltages have been detected in various lighting conditions, with specific voltage ranges reported, but a significant discrepancy is noted when measuring short-circuit current, which appears very low compared to expectations.
  • Another participant suggests that the internal resistance of the multimeter could significantly affect current measurements, and temperature effects might also contribute to voltage discrepancies.
  • A later reply confirms that a current of 1.4μA is reasonable given the expected small value of I_0, which is temperature dependent, and provides a rough estimate of the relationship between current and voltage.
  • Concerns are raised about the ability to measure the barrier potential across the junction with a voltmeter, with explanations regarding the flow of current through the voltmeter affecting the measurement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the measured values and the factors affecting them, indicating that multiple competing explanations and uncertainties remain in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the internal resistance of the measuring apparatus, potential temperature effects, and the unresolved nature of the barrier potential measurement.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in semiconductor physics, photodiode applications, and experimental measurement techniques may find this discussion relevant.

Qianlong
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am working with a silicon PIN-type photodiode in photovoltaic mode, conducting measurements of open-circuit voltage and short-circuit current for varying intensities of incident light. The light is being measured as a proxy for another quantity, and so I must apologise for I can give no quantitative values of optical power.

The photodiode has a claimed max “Operating Current” of 10mA, and an active area of 20mm^2.

The measuring apparatus is a fluke 187 digital multimeter, which can measure to precisions of tens of microvolts and tens of nanoamps, though in the setup there is some background noise (probably electrical) that renders the last digit unreliable. Attempts have also been made to measure current with a moving coil microammeter, which has a resistance of 150Ω.

As I understand it, with increasing optical power incident on the detector, the short-circuit current should increase linearly and be equal to the photocurrent. The open-circuit voltage should increase logarithmically, but for low optical powers, the increase is approximately linear*.

*The open circuit voltage is given by the equation V = KT/q ln[(I/Io +1)], which for values of I/Io<<1 the Mercator series can be used to yield V=KT/q I/Io

Open-circuit voltages have been detected at both at ultra-low light levels and in ambient environmental lighting. The open-circuit voltage s in these scenarios has ranged from 40μV to 350mV. Linearity is confirmed up until about 20mV. However, when the short-circuit current is measured, nothing is seen until the open-circuit voltage for the same light intensity exceeds 250mV. At this light intensity, the current is 1.4μA.

My question: is the current just that small? Other measurements (albeit for p-n junctions) I have seen reported in the literature record that light intensities that lead to 1mV open-circuit voltages lead to at least 1μA short-circuit currents. Certainly, one would have thought that a current much closer to 10mA would have been seen in ambient environmental lighting.

There is a second question I wished to ask, and it relates more to the theory. I understand that when p-type semiconductor is connected with n-type semiconductor, the majority carrier in each type diffuses along the concentration gradient. This leave behind ions, trapped in the crystal lattice, which generate an electrical field that opposes further diffusion. Forgive my ignorance, but why can this “barrier potential” not be read by a voltmeter placed in parallel around the junction?

Greatly obliged for your assistance.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The fluke multimeter has some internal resistance. I don't know how much (and it depends on the measurement range: smaller ranges correspond to larger internal resistances), but that could reduce the current significantly.

Unrelated to that, at the level of millivolts you can have temperature effects that lead to additional voltage differences.

As far as I know, 1.4µA is not at the lower end of the fluke precision - do you see a sudden jump in the current?

Forgive my ignorance, but why can this “barrier potential” not be read by a voltmeter placed in parallel around the junction?
Current flows through the voltmeter (and the timescale is way too short to see that) until the potential is equal at both sides. That is true for every setup without a power supply.
 
Qianlong said:
the open-circuit voltage for the same light intensity exceeds 250mV. At this light intensity, the current is 1.4μA. My question: is the current just that small?

Yes, that actually sounds quite reasonable.

The key to understanding this is to realize just how small I_0 is. It's value is very temperature dependent (due to its dependence on N_i^2), but even at I=1.4uA the ratio I/I_0 is likely to be order of around magnitude 10^5 or so.

Put this value into the equation for voltage and you'll find that it does indeed correspond to somewhere around 250 mV.
 
Last edited:
mfb said:
The fluke multimeter has some internal resistance. I don't know how much (and it depends on the measurement range: smaller ranges correspond to larger internal resistances), but that could reduce the current significantly.
Update: I tested that with a Fluke289, and at 1µA, the voltage is well below 1mV (measured: 0.15mV, but that is not reliable*). That is not an issue if the multimeters are not completely different.

*Edit: A more careful measurement showed 0.10mV.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K