Pivot point of a beam and torque

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
11 replies · 18K views
danl2011
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A beam is supported only at one point, called the pivot point, as shown in the diagram. A block with mass m1 sits at the left end of the beam, a distance L1 from the pivot point. A block with mass m2 sits at the right end of the beam, a distance L2 from the pivot point. L2 > L1. Calculate all torques about the pivot point, remembering that positive is anti-clockwise.
Select Yes, No, Less than, Equal to, or Cannot tell.

  • Given particular values of L1, L2, and m1, is it always possible to choose m2 such that the masses have no angular acceleration?
  • If m1 * L2 = m2 * L1, is there a negative torque?
  • For m1 = m2, does the angular acceleration depend only on L1 / L2 ? (If it depends on the actual values of L1 and L2, put 'no'.)
  • If m1 * L1 = m2 * L2, will the masses have an angular acceleration?

Homework Equations



Torque = Force*L

The Attempt at a Solution



  • For the first statement, since L2 is always greater than L1 by a certain ratio, if M2 is less than M1 by that same ratio, then there would be no torque, and thus no angular acceleration. However, I'm not certain my thought process is correct.
  • Since the two lengths are flipped, and no exact masses are given, there is no way to determine if this statement is true or false.
  • I'm really stuck on this one... I put no, since the torque is calculated from the sum of the each individual torque, not the product nor the quotient.
  • If the two torques are the same, then the beam wouldn't move, and thus would have no angular acceleration.

Please help me and thanks in advance.
 
on Phys.org
danl2011 said:

Homework Statement



A beam is supported only at one point, called the pivot point, as shown in the diagram.

The diagram is not show, attach it, please!

ehild
 
torque.jpg

here is the attached image that came with the problem.
 
Last edited:
danl2011 said:
[*]For m1 = m2, does the angular acceleration depend only on L1 / L2 ? (If it depends on the actual values of L1 and L2, put 'no'.)


The Attempt at a Solution



  • I'm really stuck on this one... I put no, since the torque is calculated from the sum of the each individual torque, not the product nor the quotient.


  • "NO" is the correct answer. You know that the angular acceleration is torque/moment of inertia. The moment of inertia is m1L12+m2L2 in this case.


    The angular acceleration is
    [tex]\alpha=g \frac{m_1L_1-m_2L_2}{m_1L_1^2+m_2L_2^2}[/tex].
    When the masses are equal they cancel, and the angular acceleration becomes
    [tex]\alpha=g\frac{L_1-L_2}{L_1^2+L_2^2}=g\frac{L_1/L_2-1}{L_2(1+(L_1/L_2)^2)}[/tex]

    it depends on the actual lengths, not only on their ratio.

    ehild
 
Sweet, thanks, could you possibly help determine if my answers to the other statements are right?

I gave "yes" to the first statement, cannot tell to the second and no to the fourth... but it is not correct...
 
I've already tried yes, cannot tell, no, no for the four statements... however, the online homework set still says that my answers are incorrect.
 
For the second question, I just noticed that L2>L1 was given. You can find out if the torque is negative or not.
It says that m1L2=m2L1, so m2=m1(L2/L1).

Substitute for m2 in the equation for the torque and see what you get with the condition L2>L1.

ehild
 
Could you please see if the following is correct?

Torque1 = m1*L1
Torque2 = m1*(L2)2/L1

Since L2 is greater than L1, then Torque2 is greater in magnitude than Torque1, and since counterclockwise is positive, there is negative torque.