Planar Coil Rotating in a Magnetic Field

AI Thread Summary
To achieve maximum voltage at 0 degrees and zero voltage at 90 degrees for a rotating coil in a magnetic field, the coil must be oriented parallel to the magnetic field lines at 0 degrees and perpendicular at 90 degrees. This orientation allows for maximum flux cutting when parallel, leading to maximum induced voltage, and minimal flux cutting when perpendicular, resulting in zero induced voltage. The discussion highlights the importance of including relevant equations, such as the relationship between flux and voltage, to support the explanation. The missing figure is crucial for a complete understanding of the coil's orientation in relation to the magnetic field. Overall, the correct orientation of the coil is essential for optimizing voltage output in this scenario.
bab72
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Is this correct?

In a homogeneous magnetic field of induction B, a plane coil rotates at a constant angular velocity omega. The figure shows three different positions of the thread relative to the induction lines. What orientation of the coil would be needed in prefer to have magnetic flux 0 at 90 degrees and volatge maximum at 0 degrees

To achieve maximum voltage when the coil is at 0 degrees and zero voltage when it's at 90 degrees, the coil should be oriented such that its plane is parallel to the magnetic field lines when it's at 0 degrees and perpendicular to the magnetic field lines when it's at 90 degrees. This orientation ensures maximum flux cutting when the coil is parallel to the field lines (0 degrees), resulting in maximum induced voltage, and minimum flux cutting when the coil is perpendicular to the field lines (90 degrees), resulting in zero induced voltage.
Relevant Equations
flux = BS
-
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello @bab72 , :welcome:

I had to decode your post somewhat :rolleyes: and this is what I think you mean:
bab72 said:
Homework Statement:
In a homogeneous magnetic field of induction B, a plane coil rotates at a constant angular velocity omega. The figure shows three different positions of the thread relative to the induction lines. What orientation of the coil would be needed in prefer to have magnetic flux 0 at 90 degrees and volatge maximum at 0 degrees
But the figure is missing. Can you post it?

Next is your proposed answer:
bab72 said:
To achieve maximum voltage when the coil is at 0 degrees and zero voltage when it's at 90 degrees, the coil should be oriented such that its plane is parallel to the magnetic field lines when it's at 0 degrees and perpendicular to the magnetic field lines when it's at 90 degrees. This orientation ensures maximum flux cutting when the coil is parallel to the field lines (0 degrees), resulting in maximum induced voltage, and minimum flux cutting when the coil is perpendicular to the field lines (90 degrees), resulting in zero induced voltage.
Relevant Equations: flux = BS

-
The term 'flux cutting' is inventive! But I would be happier if you include a relevant equation for the voltage, perhaps something with ##d\,{\text {flux}}\over dt## ?

##\ ##
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Back
Top