Planar motion in central forces.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of motion in a three-body problem under central forces, particularly focusing on whether the motion of two bodies remains planar when one body is massive compared to the others. The implications of angular momentum conservation in this context are explored, along with specific reference to the flatness of the solar system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that in a two-body problem under central force, the conservation of angular momentum restricts motion to a plane defined by the position and momentum vectors.
  • The same participant questions whether this planar restriction holds in a three-body scenario with one massive body, suggesting that the total angular momentum could allow for non-planar motion of the other two bodies.
  • Another participant emphasizes that if forces on planets are directed towards a fixed point (like the Sun), each planet's angular momentum about that point is conserved, implying that the motion remains in a plane.
  • This participant also argues that while orbital planes could theoretically be at angles to each other, they generally are not due to historical collisions and interactions during the formation of the solar system.
  • A later reply asks for clarification on the previous points, indicating a desire for further discussion or understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether non-planar motion is possible in a three-body problem, with some supporting the idea of planar motion due to angular momentum conservation and others questioning this assumption. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of angular momentum in three-body dynamics.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the assumptions about the nature of forces acting on the bodies or the specific conditions under which angular momentum is conserved. There is also a lack of consensus on the implications of these principles for the motion of celestial bodies.

precise
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I understand that in a two body problem under central force, corresponding to a potential V(r)(assume one body is massive compared to the other so that its motion is negligible), conservation of angular momentum implies the motion of the body to be in a plane spanned by position r and momentum p vectors.

But if we have three bodies, one of them massive, are the motions of other two bodies still restricted to a plane? Now the total angular momentum is L = L1 + L2 = r1 x p1 + r2 x p2, which is conserved. Mathematically, L could be kept constant while L1 and L2 are changing. Which means we could have motions of the two bodies in two planes orthogonal to each other, a non-planar motion. Is this allowed? If not, why? Then, what is reason for the planar motion?

In specific why is the solar system flat?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
precise said:
why is the solar system flat?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmNXKqeUtJM
 
If the forces on the planets are directed towards a fixed point O, (a good approximation if the Sun is much more massive than any planet), then each planet's angular momentum about O is separately conserved, since if r is the planet's displacement from O, and F is the force on the planet (towards O)…
\mathbf r \times \mathbf F = \mathbf r \times (-F\ \mathbf {\widehat{r}}) = 0
But…
\mathbf r \times \mathbf F = \mathbf r \times \frac{d \mathbf p}{dt} = \frac{d}{dt} (\mathbf r \times \mathbf p) - \frac{d \mathbf r}{dt} \times \mathbf p
The last term is zero because
\frac{d \mathbf r}{dt} \times \mathbf p = \frac{d \mathbf r}{dt} \times m \frac {d \mathbf r}{dt} = 0
So
\frac{d}{dt} (\mathbf r \times \mathbf p ) = 0\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \text {so} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mathbf r \times \mathbf p = \mathbf{constant\ vector}
Non-mathematically, the argument is simply that for any planet a force towards O can't give rise to a torque about O, so angular momentum about O is conserved.

So orbital planes can be at angles to each other, but in general won't be, because of collisions in the pre-planetary swirl, as A.T.'s excellent clip explains.
 
Last edited:
precise: are you clearer now?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K