Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Planck's assumption and Uncertainty principle

  1. Feb 26, 2010 #1
    Hi guys,

    I earned that

    [tex] \Delta E \Delta t \gtrapprox \frac{\hbar}{2} [/tex]

    But one thing that's really strange is, according to Planck's assumption on black-body radiation problem, it just say that energy of each osciliator can be written as

    [tex]E = nhf[/tex]

    where n is an integer. (I hope this would be true)

    So, my question is that if we can measure the energy of an osciliator precisly enough so that Energy of a certain osciliator can meet this inequality.

    [tex](n - 1)hf < E < (n+1)hf[/tex]

    At the same time, we can measure [tex] \Delta t[/tex] in some way but it won't be [tex]\infty[/tex] cause [tex] \Delta E[/tex] is obviously not 0.
    But here is the problem, we can actually know the energy of osciliator because the energy of it have to be multiple of n. So, E is nhf, and we can get the [tex] \Delta t[/tex] not an infinity value which is not reasonable. Because if we measure the energy of an object, the uncertainty of t have to be infinite.

    So, what is the problem?

    I'm not good at eng though :(
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted