Plane landing, finding the velocity

  • Thread starter Thread starter albertnewton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane Velocity
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a plane approaching a runway at a specific angle while being monitored by a radar antenna. The task is to determine the plane's constant approach speed and the distance between the plane and the radar antenna based on given rates of change and angles.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the plane's velocity components and the rates of change of distance and angle. There are attempts to express the constant speed in terms of the given rates, but uncertainty remains about how to incorporate the angular measurements correctly.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on visualizing the problem through diagrams and breaking down the velocity into components. There is ongoing exploration of how to relate the angular rates to linear speeds, with no clear consensus on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of converting angular rates to linear speeds without knowing the distance, which remains an unknown in the discussion. There is also mention of the specific units used for speed in aviation.

albertnewton
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A plane, B, is approaching a runway along a straight line 15 degrees (angle phi) below horizontal, while the radar antenna, A, is monitoring the distance, r, between A and B, as well as the angle between A and b, theta. The plane has a constant approach speed v0. In addition, when theta=20 degrees, it is known that r(dot)=216 ft/s and theta(dot)=-0.022 rad/s. Determine the corresponding values of v0 and of the distance between the plane and the radar antenna.

Phi=15 degrees
Theta=20 degrees
r(dot)=216 ft/s
theta(dot)= -0.022 rad/s
Since v is constant, a=0.

Homework Equations


a=dv/dt
v=ds/dt


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried solving knowing that a=0. However, I do not know how to utilize the r(dot) and theta(dot).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is more math than physics. You already have a = 0 because v0 is constant.
You aren't interested in he trajectory of the plane, only in the components of the vector v0,
for which you were given the angle w.r.t. horizontal.
All you have to do is convert the vector v0 to dr/dt and dtheta/dt. Or rather the other way around.
Make a drawing showing A, B and vector v0.
I hope the radar is between the plane and the runway...
 
The radar is between the runway and the plane. So when I convert v0 to dr/dt and dtheta/dt would it look like this:

v0=cos(35+15)*dr/dt - cos(90-50)*dtheta/dt
v0=cos(50)*(216 ft/s) - cos(40)*(-0.022 rad/s)

if so I don't know r so I can't convert rad/s to ft/s in order to simplify?
 
You also know the direction of v0. That should give you a second equation. Did you make the drawing ?
 
Reason I ask is because I don't see where the 35 degrees comes in.
 
Bedtime for me. make the drawing. Project v0 on the r vector and on the theta direction.
 
Yes, v0 has a component in the u_r direction (x component) and in the u_theta direction (y direction). Here's what I did but it is not correct:

v0 = (216)(cos(35)) + (-0.022)(sin(35)) = 176.949

obviously this is wrong because the -.022 is in units rad/s and I am not sure how to convert to ft/s unless in know r.
 
it should have been cos(20+15) not cos(35+15).. stupid error
 
Don't forget to correct your conversion formula: you want ft/s in the second term, not radians/s

Do these flying folks still use feet/s ? ;-)
 
  • #10
Still don't see where the addition of the angles comes from. The plane was landing, wasn't it ?
 
  • #11
Suppose it was flying straight at the radar. Would you calculate with 20 degrees + 20 degrees ?
 
  • #12
AlbertNewton said:
Yes, v0 has a component in the u_r direction (x component) and in the u_theta direction (y direction). Here's what I did but it is not correct:

v0 = (216)(cos(35)) + (-0.022)(sin(35)) = 176.949

obviously this is wrong because the -.022 is in units rad/s and I am not sure how to convert to ft/s unless in know r.

r is an unknown, so you have to leave it in.
 
  • #13
I really have to turn in now. If your drawing doesn't help you out, a different tack is to convert v0 to a horizontal and a vertical component, and then do the same with v(r, theta) = (vr, vtheta) theta = 20 deg, r is unknown.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K