jdstokes said:
Yep, we can form wave packets out of superpositions of planes waves of differing frequency, but at the end of the day the plane wave itself is non-physical right? Ie we don't see plane waves in the real world.
The more precisely the momentum of the particle is defined, the more exactly it's wavefunction will look like a plane wave. For reasons above, the wavefunction will never be a true plane wave, but a very dispersed wavepacket will look like a plane wave near the center.
If you put your particle in a box, then plane waves are normalizable, and depending on the state, may indeed be a good approximation. When blackbody radiation is discussed, the modes of the cavity are plane waves, although of course these aren't strictly wavefunctions.
Finally, when we do scattering calculations we often assume an approximately monoenergetic beam of particles scattering off of some target (perhaps another beam). Although the plane wave description isn't good everywhere, the calculation receives its dominant contribution from the center of the scattering potential, and, as long as the potential is weak, we can say that the incident wave is well approximated by a plane wave. This is because the wavefunction
[tex]:\psi(x,t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int^{\,\infty}_{-\infty} A(k) ~ e^{i(kx-\omega(k)t)} \,dk[/tex]
is appproximately a plane wave as long as [tex]A(k)[/tex] has support mainly around a single value of [tex]k[/tex].