Mastering Plane Physics: Solving Equations & Understanding Procedures

  • Thread starter Thread starter itzela
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Planes
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving plane equations in three-dimensional space, specifically finding planes through given points and parallel to other planes. The first problem involves determining a plane through the origin parallel to the plane defined by the equation 2x - y + 3z = 1, using the normal vector <2, -1, 3>. The second problem requires finding a plane that passes through the point (1, 2, 3) and contains the line defined by the parametric equations x=3t, y=1+t, z=2-t. Key insights include the necessity of three noncollinear points to define a plane and the application of translations in plane equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector notation and operations
  • Familiarity with the equation of a plane in three-dimensional space
  • Knowledge of parametric equations of lines
  • Concept of translations in geometric contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the equation of a plane from a point and a normal vector
  • Learn about the geometric interpretation of vector cross products
  • Explore the concept of noncollinearity in defining planes
  • Investigate the method of finding intersection points of lines and planes
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with three-dimensional geometry, particularly in fields involving vector calculus and spatial analysis.

itzela
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I have been working on these two problems for a while now and I can't seem to come up with the right procedure to take them on:

1) Find the plane through the origin and parallel to the plane 2x - y + 3z = 1

* I thought this could be solved by taking the vector of the parallel plane <2, -1, 3> and cross multiplying with the origin, but that didn't get me anywhere.

2) Find the plane that passes through (1, 2, 3) and contains the line x=3t, y=1+t, z=2-t

* The same problem occurred in this case.

I know how to find a plane when given a point and a normal (perpendicular) vector... what would be of great help is if anyone could help me understand how to find the equation of planes under different circumstances (like the two problems above). Thanks a bunch =)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There are always multiple ways of solving these kind of problems, but the following seems straightforward.

1) If you put in x=z=0 in the equation of the plane, you'll find the point where the plane crosses the y-axis. Now you need to translate the plane over some distance parallel to y to make this zero. (Do you know how translations work in general?)

2) You need three noncollinear points to be able to construct a plane. The equation of the line will give you 2, the given point in the plane is a third.
 
Thanks for the quick reply.
But no, I do not know how do a translation of a plane... could you explain :smile: ?
 
Just like you translate the graph of a function. The graph of f(x-c) is translated over a distance c wrt the graph of f(x).
 
i understood the first problem:

the normal vector to the plane would be <2, -1, 3> and the equation of the plane would be the dot product of the <2, -1, 3> *<x+0, y+0, z+0>=0
and the answer would be 2x - y + 3z = 0

for the second problem i am given two points:
(1, 2, 3) and (0, 1, 2)
* could I just plug in any number for t (say, 1) to get a third point?
 
Last edited:
Actually, you are only "given" one point. You clearly got the point (0, 1, 2) by putting t= 0 in the equation of the line. Since all points of the line are in the plane, choosing any other value of t (t=1 would be convenient) will give you a third point in the plane.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
909
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
46
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K