Planet moving in elliptical orbit around a star

  • Thread starter Thread starter songoku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Centripetal Orbit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a planet moving in an elliptical orbit around a star, focusing on the application of centripetal force and angular momentum in this context. Participants are examining the validity of using certain formulas that assume circular motion, despite the elliptical nature of the orbit.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants question the appropriateness of using centripetal force equations in an elliptical orbit, emphasizing that these equations assume a constant radius. Others suggest considering conservation laws, particularly angular momentum, while discussing the relationship between tangential velocity and angular velocity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring various interpretations of the problem and questioning the assumptions behind the formulas being used. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of central potential and the components of acceleration, although there is no explicit consensus on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem's assumptions may lead to confusion, particularly regarding the definitions of centripetal acceleration and the implications of using Kepler's laws. There is also mention of missing information related to angles in the context of angular momentum calculations.

songoku
Messages
2,509
Reaction score
393
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Not sure
1716116482573.png


(a) I use centripetal force to solve this question, even though the question states elliptical orbit

$$\frac{GMm}{r^2}=m\omega^2 r$$
$$\omega^2 r^3=GM$$

So,
$$\omega_{A}^{2} r_{A}^{3}=\omega_{B}^{2} r_{B}^{3}$$
$$\frac{r_A}{r_B}=\left(\frac{\omega_{B}}{\omega_{A}}\right)^{\frac{2}{3}}$$

Is this correct?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think you can use that formula in an elliptical orbit. There can be a radial component to the acceleration.
What do you know is conserved?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
haruspex said:
I don't think you can use that formula in an elliptical orbit.
Just let me emphasise that you most definitely cannot use that formula. It assumes that the radius is constant, which directly contradicts the assumptions of the problem.

As an additional hint, all you need to know here is that the potential is central. The actual functional behaviour of the force magnitude is irrelevant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
haruspex said:
I don't think you can use that formula in an elliptical orbit. There can be a radial component to the acceleration.
Is the radial component of acceleration the centripetal acceleration? Or is it something else?

haruspex said:
What do you know is conserved?
I think it should be angular momentum, so:
$$m v_A r_A = m v_B r_B$$

I don't think I can use ##v=\omega r## because it is not circular motion so how to relate the equation to ##\omega##?

Orodruin said:
As an additional hint, all you need to know here is that the potential is central. The actual functional behaviour of the force magnitude is irrelevant.
Sorry, what do you mean by "potential is central"?

Thanks
 
songoku said:
I think it should be angular momentum, so:
$$m v_A r_A = m v_B r_B$$
Not exactly. The angular momentum depends only on the tangential component of the velocity.

songoku said:
I don't think I can use ##v=\omega r## because it is not circular motion so how to relate the equation to ##\omega##?
As such, ##\omega r## is definitely equal to the tangential component of the velocity by definition.

songoku said:
Sorry, what do you mean by "potential is central"?
A central potential depends only on ##r##, meaning the force is always pointing to the center.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
Orodruin said:
Just let me emphasise that you most definitely cannot use that formula. It assumes that the radius is constant, which directly contradicts the assumptions of the problem.
An apparent paradox is that, if one assumes that the planet moves in a straight line at constant velocity, one gets the correct answer for part (a).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
Seeing the question, the first part can be done using Kepler law which you have done correctly. For second part basic conservation of energy can be utilised to solve it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
songoku said:
Is the radial component of acceleration the centripetal acceleration? Or is it something else?
Sorry, I should have been clearer. A radial component other than centripetal acceleration, i.e. ## \ddot r##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
Super Man said:
the first part can be done using Kepler law which you have done correctly
If you mean Kepler III, the radius in that law refers to the semi-major axis. It is a law relating all planets orbiting the same star, not all positions of a given planet. It does not apply to the first part of this question.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
  • #10
Orodruin said:
Not exactly. The angular momentum depends only on the tangential component of the velocity.
Maybe you mean something like this?
$$mv_Ar_A\sin \theta=mv_Br_B\sin \beta$$

where ##\theta## and ##\beta## is the angle between ##v## and ##r## at point A and B. Using ##v=\omega r##:
$$\omega_A r_{A}^{2}\sin \theta=\omega_B r_{B}^{2}\sin \beta$$

The question does not give information about ##\theta## and ##\beta##. How to continue?

haruspex said:
Sorry, I should have been clearer. A radial component other than centripetal acceleration, i.e. ## \ddot r##
Is ## \ddot r## the angular acceleration?

Thanks
 
  • #11
songoku said:
Using ##v=\omega r##:
No, ##v_B\sin(\beta)=\omega r_B##, etc.
songoku said:
Is ## \ddot r## the angular acceleration?
No, it is the rate of increase of the rate of increase of the radius. In a circular orbit it is zero.
The component of the acceleration vector in the radial direction is ##\ddot r-r\omega^2##. See e.g. https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Acceleration_Vector_in_Polar_Coordinates

Note also that the centripetal acceleration is not ##\omega^2r##. Centripetal acceleration is that component of the total acceleration which is normal to the velocity. If the velocity has a radial component then the centripetal acceleration is not entirely radial. The full expression for it in polar coordinates is horrendous.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
  • #12
songoku said:
Maybe you mean something like this?
$$mv_Ar_A\sin \theta=mv_Br_B\sin \beta$$

where ##\theta## and ##\beta## is the angle between ##v## and ##r## at point A and B. Using ##v=\omega r##:
$$\omega_A r_{A}^{2}\sin \theta=\omega_B r_{B}^{2}\sin \beta$$
For angular momentum use ##~~\mathbf L =\mathbf r\times\mathbf p##.

Remember that ##~~\mathbf p=m\mathbf v## and ##\mathbf v=\mathbf \omega \times \mathbf r##. Put it together using the vector triple product rule.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
  • #13
Super Man said:
Seeing the question, the first part can be done using Kepler law which you have done correctly.
This is incorrect.

Please refrain from confusing the OP by providing wrong answers.
 
  • #14
I understand.

Thank you very much for all the help and explanation haruspex, Orodruin, kuruman, Super Man
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K