Plank problem/Center of Gravity/Torque/Level Arm(p.26)

  • Thread starter Thread starter gcombina
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a physics problem involving torque and the center of gravity of a 10-meter plank weighing 100 N, supported 1 meter from each end. An 800 N person must determine how close they can stand to one end without tipping the plank. The correct approach involves calculating torque using the average distance of the plank's mass, which is 4.5 meters from the pivot point, rather than incorrectly applying the total length of the plank. The resolution emphasizes the importance of understanding the center of mass in torque calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torque calculations in physics
  • Knowledge of center of mass and its significance
  • Familiarity with equilibrium conditions in static systems
  • Basic grasp of forces and weight distribution
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of torque and equilibrium in static mechanics
  • Learn about the center of mass and its calculation for irregular shapes
  • Explore examples of torque problems involving multiple forces and supports
  • Investigate the effects of varying support positions on stability
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of torque and center of mass in practical applications.

gcombina
Messages
157
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


A horizontal, 10-m plank weighs 100 N. It rests on two supports that are placed 1.0 m from each end as shown in the figure. How close to one end can an 800-N person stand without causing the plank to tip?
(a) 0 m (d) 0.7 m

(b) 0.3 m (e) 0.9 m

(c) 0.5 m

Homework Equations


T = Force x level arm

The Attempt at a Solution

T = F x L

mg x (center of gravity of the plank) = mg x level arm
[ (90N)(9.8) ] ( 4.5 ) = [ (800N)(9.8) ] ( l )

level arm = .5

My question is why do "center of mass" needs to be used?

I originally did 90N but didn't work so I had to do 4.5 for the center of mass

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • q26.png
    q26.png
    3.3 KB · Views: 2,322
Physics news on Phys.org
gcombina said:
[ (90N)(9.8) ] ( 4.5 ) = [ (800N)(9.8) ] ( l )
You've forgotten the rest of the plank.
gcombina said:
My question is why do "center of mass" needs to be used?
As opposed to using what? Or do you mean why is the centre of mass at 4.5?
gcombina said:
I originally did 90N but didn't work so I had to do 4.5 for the center of mass
I've no idea what you mean. How exactly did you "do" 90N?
If there's some approach you took that didn't work, please post all the working, and explain how you know it did not work.
 
because i did the torque from the left side which is 9.0 meters

I am doing the torque on the left = torque on the right

the torque on the left starts from the second fulcrum to the left

see belowI did mg x length
[ (90N)(9.8) ] ( 9.0 m ) = FL

And this way did NOT work

I had to change it to

[ (90N)(9.8) ] ( 4.5 m ) = Fl
 
Hello and welcome back! non-Shouting contest misunderstanding ironed out, I hope :)

I completely agree with the anti-clockwise torque (torque on the left).
The 4.5 m is the average distance of the wood to the left of the pivot point to that pivont point
Now the right-hand side.

And if you want do do some checking of the way you obtain your answer: have the support in the center and check that the person has to be 5m from the right end of the plank.
 
:)
 
gcombina said:
I did mg x length
[ (90N)(9.8) ] ( 9.0 m ) = FL

And this way did NOT work

I had to change it to

[ (90N)(9.8) ] ( 4.5 m ) = Fl
Right, so you want to know why the second is correct?
If all of the mass of the 9m of plank were at 9m from the fulcrum then of course the torque would be 90*9*9.8. But it is spread evenly from zero distance to 9m. If you think of the plank as made of mass elements ##\rho dx## at distance x, the torque of an element is ##\rho x dx##. On average, an element is at distance 4.5, so treat it as though the whole mass is at that distance.

Now, as BvU said, let's move on the the other side of the equation. You had that wrong in the OP, as I mentioned in my first comment of post #2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
17K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K