Plasma instabilities in fusion reactors

  • Thread starter Thread starter ak33m98
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fusion Plasma
Click For Summary
Plasma instability in fusion reactors is primarily caused by steep pressure gradients and strong plasma currents, which can lead to disruptive behaviors. Various empirical and theoretical laws, such as the Suydam and Mercier Criteria, are utilized to predict plasma stability. Numerical tools also play a significant role in analyzing these instabilities. For those seeking foundational knowledge, recommended readings include Gurnett's "Introduction to Plasma Physics" and Freidberg's "Theory of Fusion Systems and MHD." Understanding these concepts is crucial for advancing fusion research and improving reactor stability.
ak33m98
I know that fusion experiments are difficult due to the fact the plasma seldom stays stable for long, but what exactly causes this plasma instability and are they any formulas to possibly predict the destabilisation of the plasma?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
ak33m98 said:
I know that fusion experiments are difficult due to the fact the plasma seldom stays stable for long, but what exactly causes this plasma instability and are they any formulas to possibly predict the destabilisation of the plasma?

In magnetic confinement, the most disruptive instabilities are driven by steep pressure gradients or strong plasma currents.

There are a number of laws (both empirical and theoretical) that are used to predict stability/instability. There are also a number of numerical tools that are used to analyze stability.

Some examples:
Suydam Criteria
Mercier Criteria
Greenwald Limit
Troyon Limit
 
Drakkith said:
The following article lists several instabilities and their causes. Perhaps it can help you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_stability
Thanks for that link, but a lot of what it speaks about and refers to are out of my scope of knowledge, if you could point me in the direction of any introductory books/writings on the matter it would be greatly appreciated
 
perturbation theory - define a small perturbation z (just a little displacement), then stick that into the Magnetohydrodynamic momentum equation (mdu/dt = pressure gradient) where pressure a sum of kinetic (P=nKT) and magnetic pressure (magnetic field lines actually repel each other, and are 'tied' to the plasma in ideal MHD theory).

Anyway you get something like mz'' = F(z), which is the same as mx''=F(x), with z being the small perturbation displacement. F(z) is very long and complicated, but has a mathematical property of self-adjointedness that basically leads you to know that the w in z=z0*exp(-iwt), which is one of many modes (solutions) to the mz'' = F(z) is either purely real (the displacement leads to oscillation, and the plasma is stable to that mode) or purely imaginary (exponential growth, not stable) - so you can look for marginal stability conditions where w=0. mw^2z=0=F(z), which simplifies things. This is the normal mode analysis. There is also an energy pronciple, where you look for solutions to a pertubation energy (not momentum) equation, where again your x is the perturbation z. Then if dW>0 it's stable, if not, plasmas f***ed. Now I might have some details wrong.

Ch 6 of Gurnett Introduction to Plasma Physics is good
But I think Freidberg's Theory of Fusion Systems and MHD books are the standards for this
 
Last edited:
What type of energy is actually stored inside an atom? When an atom is split—such as in a nuclear explosion—it releases enormous energy, much of it in the form of gamma-ray electromagnetic radiation. Given this, is it correct to say that the energy stored in the atom is fundamentally electromagnetic (EM) energy? If not, how should we properly understand the nature of the energy that binds the nucleus and is released during fission?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K