Plausible Impact Energy of a Small Meteroid?

AI Thread Summary
A rough estimate for the impact energy of a small meteoroid, approximately 0.1 to 0.2 meters in diameter, suggests an energy release around 10-8 megatons, equivalent to about 10 kilograms of TNT or 43 megajoules. The calculation relies on understanding the kinetic energy based on the meteoroid's mass, density, and impact speed. Most of the energy from small meteoroids is released into the atmosphere upon impact. The Torino impact hazard scale, which is primarily applicable to larger asteroids, indicates that energy content scales with the cube of the size. However, the validity of these estimates for such small meteoroids remains uncertain.
Pgeske
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Could someone please give me a plausible impact energy of a very small (maybe .1 or .2 meters diameter) meteoroid hitting the earth. This does not need to be exact at all. I just would like an extremely rough estimate of a possible energy of impact. For example, larger meteoroids (i.e, 7-8 meters) can impact with kilotons of TNT. How about small meteoroids? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well the impact force would be F=dp/dt the change in momentum divided by the impact time. Where the impact time would be small and tricky to measure.
 
Technically you can calculate the kinetic energy of an asteroid if you know its impact speed and mass, or instead of mass, density and size. All of this energy is released on impact, but for small meteoroids all or most of this energy is released to the atmosphere.

To get an average number you can perhaps look at the Torino impact hazard scale where a 1 km asteroid is equated to an energy release of 105 MT. Since energy content scales with the cube of the size of the asteroid a small asteroid at 0.1 meter size would then have 10-12 times that much energy which is around 10-8 MT, 10 kg of TNT, or 43 MJ.

Note that this may not be a valid number, since the Torino scale seems to be applicable mainly for asteroids of sizes above 20 meter.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top